Journal tomhudson's Journal: Threatening to "out" me? Silly kook ... 171
Silly usenet kook - trying to troll me is like bringing coals to Newcastle
It was funny to see a usenet kook (search for "Jennifer Usher srs kook faq") threatening to "out" me. I've been "out" on slashdot since 2005, and slashdot has a lot more readers than an obscure usenet group.
Of course, outing someone against their will is in bad taste, not to mention it could have serious real-world consequences, from job loss to physical injury. It's one reason I recommend not "being stealth", even when, like me, it's a realistic option. Not to mention that it's illegal in plenty of places (like where I live), and a violation of many TOS. Oh wait, I just mentioned it. Silly me
Part Two: The advantages and disadvantages of being "out"
First, consider that in the long term you may not realistically have a choice. It's almost inevitable that if you're living in "stealth mode", there are going to be some slip-ups. It could be as simple as someone from your past accidentally mentioning it to someone they thought already knew, or gaps in your cover story that will elicit questions. A legal issue could arise that requires you to acknowledge your previous life before you changed gender. Someone you trusted may simply decide to out you over some petty grievance.
You don't have control over how this happens, and when that happens, life can get ugly. Damage control will be difficult, and the consequences both at home and at work can be devastating. On the other hand, if the people around you already know, and you treat it like a non-issue, so will most of them.
simplify your life and reduce your stress
There's also something else to consider when weighing the question of "to stealth or not to stealth" - just how much background stress are you experiencing when, in the back of your mind, you have this nagging worry that some day the other shoe will drop. Do you remember how relieved you were to start living full-time as a woman rather than maintaining two identities? Consider how much better life could, not just for you but for those around you, when the world isn't divided into "those who know" and "those I hope don't find out.".
Society has changed in the last few decades, and the perceived stigma associated with having a transsexual past is less than ever. Most people understand that it's not something you "choose", it's something you "are", same as your skin colour or your height or age, or whether you catch colds easily. When it comes to gender, "it is what it is", same as sexual orientation.
Another advantage is that when you finally find the job you like and are settled in, it won't suddenly become an issue that you may have fudged your resumé to cover for some of the gaps in your past.
There are, of course, problems that can come up by being open about your past. There will always be the gossip, the petty person who can only make themselves feel good by making others feel bad. If they don't know, they can't use it against you. However, by the same token, if you don't care who knows, and if the people around you already know, they can't really use it against you either. By being "out", you've at least partially immunized yourself from such ignorami.
Usher attacks anyone - transsexual, transgender, cross-dresser, whatever - who doesn't "measure up" to some mythical standard because Usher is, quite literally, unable to pass as a woman. Once claiming to be a transvestite, then "more than a transvestite but less than a transsexual", then all sorts of other crazy combos, nobody believes Usher ever was a transsexual, and is certainly not typical. Confronted with this after a decade of attacking transsexuals, Usher attacks all transsexuals who disagree, or those of us who, like me, support the rights of all LGBT, not just other transsexuals.
Like every other group, transsexuals attract a certain subset of crazies. Dealing with them is where I first learned to troll, so it has its' good points.
A bit more context: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/browse_thread/thread/37ddf476ca3cece1#
Usher is the archetype of a transquisling. Claims to belong, but motivated by self-loathing, fear of being discovered as a fake, and sheer stupidity, actively works to undermine transsexuals. Oh well, another month, another silly threat
skimmed the link (Score:2)
I skimmed the link and cannot tell who is trolling whom.
Re: (Score:2)
Usher has been attacking transsexuals and other transgenders on-line for the past decade. Usher also is an employee of the University of California San Francisco, working with CAPS - one of the departments that deals with LGBT issues. As such, Usher has access to information about people who would be sensitive to being outed.
For a state employee in such a position to not only attack members of the LGBT community on a regular basis, but to now start threatening to out them, is one of those WTF situations
Re: (Score:2)
Didn't know this tool was employed in a position of trust. While I doubt Anonymous would be of help, there's certainly ways to make a public employee's life hell.
Re: (Score:2)
It gets better ... the aforementioned tool has gone ahead with the threats, and said that it won't matter because it wasn't done at work. I'm in the process of doing what has to be done. BTW, say "hi" to the tool - because the tool is reading everything I write, and has been doing so for some time.
The funny thing is that Usher doesn't have a clue. For example
Re: (Score:2)
I've never understood the motivations of the stalker. People seriously need better hobbies. (Like my ex-wife's friends, is it really that interesting reading what I'm saying here? Maybe Tom and I could introduce one of you to Usher and you could leave us alone?)
Re: (Score:1)
Well, why not ask tomhudson, who has been stalking me for some time. That is why I responded as I did. I simply provided tomhudson a taste of what tomhudson has done to me, except I told the truth.
In fa
Re: (Score:2)
Tom gets a pass because she is entertaining. So far, you don't earn a pass.
Re: (Score:1)
Sorry, but for me this is not a joke, or something to be entertaining about. You see, for me this is about my life. Unlike some, for example, tomhudson, I am not interested in telling any and all about my history, Some in my life know, most don't. I don't broadcast my situation. I did not choose to be out online, but was outed quite against my will.
Quite frankly, I am not looking for
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I don't attack people because I disagree with them. I do stand up to petty little bullies who can't take what they wish to dish out.
I don't identify as a "woman born transsexual." The person who invented that term is a well known kook, but that is a story for another day. As I said, I identify a a woman, period.
Actually, tomhudson wanted me to join in starting a discussion site and I declined. He became angry and started attacking me. Funny, but he does exactly what he cla
Re: (Score:1)
Truer words were never spoken.
Re: (Score:2)
Good thing, because we've seen the pics, and pass you don't.
So lets see ... Andrea James [andreajames.com] isn't a transsexual. Lynn [umich.edu]
Re: (Score:2)
The only reason I'm out here is because I got outed helping someone else back in 2005 - and there are still ma
Re: (Score:2)
Nina Arseneault has two post-graduate degrees. You have nothing.
Nina Arseneault is being sponsored by companies like Shoppers DrugMart - Canada's largest drug chain - for her next play. You went on workfare to get your 1-room bug-infested SRO on skid row.
You meet Andrea James definition of akook. [tsroadmap.com]
Re: (Score:2)
You're the one who outed me on usenet, not the other way around. That makes you the netkook. You're the one with the q
Re: (Score:2)
I have never threatened to reveal anyone's birth name anywhere. You did. Maybe I should send a link to AJ and ask her to comment on it, since you seem to think she's a friend of yours.
You're the one who is making this public, by following me here (I have never posted on your crappy justjenniferblog.blogspot.com blog). I'm just exploiting it to the max, to let the world see how UCSF (University of California San Francisco) needs to revamp their hiring practices because they let a known trans-hater named
Usher and the 10 year itch. (Score:2)
Your lies about being a computer programmer are easily disproved, and germane to slashdot.
You claimed to have all this computer experience, and you you have spent the last decade living on the streets, in homeless shelters, or cadging a room in someone else's home. The last 5 years you've been living in an SRO (single room occupancy) in the Mission Street Hotel, which only accepts placements from other government agencies working with the homeless.
They got you a workfare job as a clerk.
All that "IT kno
Re: (Score:2)
You've been pushing people around for years and years, and we're all fed up with it - not just in the news groups but on the web.
Your attacking people from a UCSF computer makes it a public policy problem. You've done it before, and you were warned by UCSF then, remember?
Re: (Score:2)
I already gave the instructions. Not my fault you can't use google - everyone else can find them easy enough.
but what the heck, I'll just take this opportunity to post what some other people think of you:
A classic from 2007 http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/47303ec58e82f63d [google.com]
THE THOMAS 'JENNIFER' USHER TRANSVESTITE KOOK FAQ
Thomas "Jennifer" Usher, known net-wide by his more common name of Tommy Usher, has been accused of being an internet kook and posting several thousand messa
Re: (Score:2)
Unlike some, for example, tomhudson, I am not interested in telling any and all about my history, Some in my life know, most don't. I don't broadcast my situation.
Your TL;DR post elsewhere in this journal calls this into question.
Sorry for the high s/n ratio. (Score:2)
Sorr We've been putting up with this brain-fart's crap for almost a decade. The lies, the threats to sue (too numerous to count), the abuse. A little noise pollution in my journal on Troll Tuesday in return for some great background quotes is a fair trade-off.
This is probably going to get a LOT more public over the next 3 months.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure why this person has so much invested in this. For christ's sake, my ex-wife's friends have done me real damage online, yet I let it roll off my back, knowing that their loveless marriages are the crop they are reaping with their harpyish behaviour.
Similarly, if your stalker is so offended by you and your actions, the best bet would be to ignore it. Living well is the best revenge (although, based on what pc thinks is 'living well', I'm not sure that that is possible).
FWIW, I've generally though
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks.
There's a long history here, I sort of let some people down 5 years ago after first exposing this retard - I didn't follow through. This is one of those "pay it forward" things. Other people stood up so I can enjoy the rights I have. Plus porkchop has messed up a few people, including someone you've encountered online.
Re: (Score:2)
The contents of your 70,000 usenet posts, your transvestite geocities web site (when you were claiming to be a transvestite), your cyberstalking transsexuals all over the internet with the recurring leitmotif - "You are not a transsexual" and going on and on about why you are and they aren't, say otherwise.
Care to tell us how many sites you've been banned from? Hint: It's more than one. Lots more.
Sample of Usher's cheesy Transvestite Porn (Score:2)
(for future reference)
Warning; When I say cheesy, I mean cheesy. Worse than "gubbemint cheeze" cheesy. Originally posted to a group devoted to cross-dressing.
http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.support.srs/msg/9573472c3f90b401?&q=lacey+satin+jennifer+usher [google.ca]
There's more, but I think this makes the point.
Question # 1: Who would write crap like that - a woman (genetic or trans), or some guy with a transvestic fetish?
Question # 2: How much of a dumb fuck do you have to be to follow me here knowing
Re: (Score:2)
No, - look where you posted it - you posted it to a cross-dressing forum, porkchop, when you were "Jennifer Usher, more than a transvestite, but less than a transsexual".
Nobody bought your excuse then, and nobody buys it today.
You're a joke. You've been screwing with people's heads for a decade, and now there's a group of people who are fed up with your continued abuse.
You've changed your back-story more times than a snake sheds its skin. That's why anyone who knows you doesn't believe you. The d
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, a little warning about those picasaweb links next time? Yikes!
Re: (Score:2)
pics or it didn't happen.
Oh wait - it didn't happen. At least I never saw any - except your attempt to fix up the one the newspaper published to use in your gmail profile, that looked like you had poked out your eyes, and made everyone else wish they had poked out theirs first.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a blow-up of a pic from a column of "ask the person in the street" interviews.
That's how it was found and included into the picasa pics.
And if your facebook pic is anything like this one in being "accurate", I would hide it too.
Re: (Score:2)
I was wondering if you pulled them off of somethingawful.
Re: (Score:2)
It would make a good "photoshop this" on fark.
It's a shame. This one individual kook has caused lots of annoyances for a lot of people. It's always the same old story - two weights, two measures. After Usher continued to harass me from a UCSF email account a few years ago, I wrote one of the rectors. The rules were laid down - no more mail from work, no more usenet posts from work.
Obviously they should have included "no cyberstalking from work" :-)
Oh well, At least I've got
The Myth Of Howard Thomas Usher's Sex Change (Score:2)
by JenniferFlusher
Howard Thomas Usher, also known on the internet as Jennifer Usher, likes to
pretend that he is a person who underwent a sex change in 2006.
This post will prove that Howard almost certainly never had sex change
surgery and give the reasons why. Howard has been known as "Jennifer
Usher" since 2000 on the i
Re: (Score:2)
Another fascist "big lie" that fails. There was no "careful editing". I reposted the whole post, PLUS a link so anyone else can follow the thread. You are being your typical nazi fascist self by purposefully overlooking that fact.
You're the one who is obsessed with everyone's status. You go all over the internet insulting everyone who disagrees with you, regardless of their gender or status. You're the one that insists that it's the genitals that count - a position you only adopted 5 years ago. You say t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Jennifer Usher: Part 1 - Attacking transsexuals an (Score:2)
Topics in this post include Jennifer Usher's attacks on transgender and transsexual women, years of attacks on a woman who was raped, a crude attempt at outing me, claims of 'special privilege', and the University of California San Francisco's action (or lack thereof) over the years concerning Usher's use of UCSF computers and work time to harass transsexuals on the Internet.
Introduction To begin this sto
Re: (Score:2)
You know, this is entirely too much information. Not because you should be 'in' or 'out' or whatever. It's TMI because I don't give a fuck. That was a shitload of information, and I just don't care. I doubt anyone does.
Get a life. Get a hobby. Seriously.
Re: (Score:1)
You want to know the truth? I hope no one does care. Becauae to tell you the truth, it really is no one's business. But, I do feel I have a right to counter lies.
And I got a life...a quite goo
Re: (Score:2)
A life as a homeless person living in the vice motel - a single-room occupancy shelter for people who were placed there by their case workers. 5 years now, and you haven't moved on, despite the bedbug bites, the drug dealers, the police, the hookers, because "living well is the best revenge" and for you, that's the best you've lived in a decade.
If you think that's a life, you're mental.
Re: (Score:1)
Ironically, this is an
Re: (Score:1)
It appears that tomhudson has invited the idiot trolls to come play.
I will warn you...this could get nasty.
Oh, did I happen to mention that most of them are kill filed on my system?
You'e being trolled, you dumb f*ck! (Score:2)
Nobody gives a shit. Most of my fans will ignore this thread - we're all doing more interesting stuff elsewhere, and this IS Troll Tuesday. You're being TROLLED, you dumb fuck! :-) It's a longstanding tradition here, and today you're it.
You're the idiot who decided to follow me here. I've just been reposting some of your funnier material, like "Drug dealers? Hookers? Police? ROTFL! I live in an urban area." You live in San Francisco's
Re: (Score:1)
I cannot believe anyone is so bad at geography that they would think the Mission District is the Tenderloin. Not even close. And no, there are NO web cam feeds from my building. There is one from the Seneca I belive. That is quite a ways off from here. I mean, this guy is completely making up his facts. Oh wait, I see part of the pr
You're being trolled, you dumb f*ck! (Score:2)
520 south van ness. That's the address I use to get that wonderful (haha) picture of the building's exterior, complete with the 3 "pissing trees" mentioned in one of the reviews quoted elsewhere in thread - the trees that stink so much because the people standing outside drinking all day piss on them instead of using a toilet.
The place isn't just a dump - it stinks. But at least they got that last dead body out before it got too ripe,
Talk about ringing in the new year - I'm all choked up ... oops, sorr
Re: (Score:2)
In my world, EVERY day is Troll Tuesday.
Re: (Score:2)
I know the feeling (and where you're coming from). I've had a few years like that.
Sometimes it seems like it will take forever to get the important stuff (kids) fixed up right, but they're not stupid. They can figure things out and reach the right conclusions; in comparison, everything else is less important.
Just hang in there. It's worth it in the end.
Re: (Score:2)
Not at all. Anyone can add them up and see for themselves. And your lame attempt to reduce the number by saying "some of them were cross-posts" didn't wash, because YOU control the cross-posting when you reply. You have gone out of your way to cross-post flames in various other news groups, stalking people you disagree with, and gotten your fat ass handed back to you with a "we don't give a fuck now kindly fuck off you stupid fuck!"
68,000. And that includes some
Re: (Score:2)
That makes 8.
I so love Troll Tuesdays/
Re: (Score:2)
Keep in mind that this same mentally disturbed individual changed names at least 5 times that we know of - to female, back to male, back to female, back to male, back to female ... and whose story has changed so many t
Re: (Score:1)
<YAWN>
tomhudson, as I said, gets upset when what he does is done to him. Yes, I used male pronouns. I'm sorry, but I don't see this person as remotely female. Your mileage may vary.
The stuff in that FAQ is mostly lies. But lies only hurt if you let them. Personally, I prefer reality. I have different priorities, and I spend my money on things like travel (my daughter and grandchildren are quite a distance away) and books (I am learning iPhone programmin
Troll tuesday strikes again! This is how I trolled (Score:2)
But first - see the homeless shelter Usher has been living in for the last 5 years [sfweekly.com] while claiming that "living well is the best revenge" and attacking others for where or how they live. Truly a mental case. There's nothing wrong with being poor, or homeless - but there's serious brain damage involved when you try to claim that is "living well" and denigrate *evryone* else who have their own places instead of living in a shelter for people who need "case management".
If you had
Re: (Score:1)
Oh, and just because I don't respond to everything does not mean it is accurate. Just that this gets boring after a while.
That article is laughable. While there is some truth there, the name of the place is the Mission Hotel, most of it was bogus. The stuff about the manager, for example...they did try to get a restraining order, and they were laughed out of court.
As to names...well, I go by facts that can be confirmed, and which are not remotely hidden. I take claims like "I
Poverty Hotel - a documentary about the Vice Hotel (Score:2)
About Hotel Poverty
Tucked beneath the shadows of San Francisco's financial district, the Tenderloin is home to most of the city's 518 single room occupancy hotels. Their eight by ten foot rooms are filled with all types; mostly society's marginalized: African American men, the mentally ill, HIV patients, transsexuals and drug addicts. In the third richest city in the country, single room occupancy (SRO) hotels house 30,000 people in third-world condi
Re: (Score:1)
I do not live in the Tenderloin, and this has nothing to do with where I live. Oh, and by the way, I do have my own bath and toilet. Another fact that he tries to overlook. Shoot, I would not have stayed here if I didn't.
And yes, there are places where people pay $600 to a $1000 a month. They are quite nasty places, run by greedy slumlords who take advantage of the immigrant population that has to take what they can get. Many can hardly be called SROs. In some of them, entir
Re: (Score:2)
You live at the Mission Hotel. 520 South Van Ness Avenue, between Post Street and Mission Street; that is the Tenderloin according to both Wikipedia and Google Maps.
Two reviews: http://www.yelp.com/biz/mission-hotel-san-francisco [yelp.com]
Choice quote:
Re: (Score:1)
Post St. is nowhere near the Mission Hotel, or Mission Street. Apparently tomhudson cannot read a map. And no, the Mission Hotel, surprisingly enough, is in the Mission, not the Tenderloin. If one cannot tell that from a map, one is pretty bad off.
Yes, the Mission Hotel is operated by Tenderloing Housing Clinic. So what?
As to the Yelp comments, there are a lot of people who want to gentrify San Franciso. They have pushed out the middle class, and now they want to push
Murder at the Vice Hotel-not a nice place to live (Score:2)
And that's being conservative - the blight of the Tenderloin extends beyond Van Ness
The documentary and the web cams don't lie.
Neither do the news reports [sfexaminer.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Murder rate for your building this year: 1 in 280.
Murder rate for New Orlead - the murder capital of the US of A in 2008: 1 in 1,562.
Your building is more than 5x as dangerous as the most dangerous city in the United States. It must be the scenic charm of the drunks pissing on the three trees in front at all hours of the day and night that give it that certain "air" of "local charm" that keeps you there.
Or sharing in the warm glo
Re: (Score:2)
You tossed porkchop a bone with your quote, and pc hasn't bit.
BTW, I kinda like porkchops, but if this mental connection grows much stronger, I'm gonna go all Leviticus on swine.
Re: (Score:2)
"I am happy, have a much nicer place than tomhudson wants to imagine"
The pictures say it all - if you're happy there, you're mentally ill, same as the miser who won't spring for a bar of soap to make life a bit cleaner and safer.
Re: (Score:2)
The tenderloin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenderloin,_San_Francisco [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.thclinic.org/content/locations/mission.php [thclinic.org]
--------
The Mission Hotel
520 South Van Ness Ness Ave
The Mission hotel was acquired by THC through the SRO/Master Lease Program in October of 1999. The project was undertaken at
Re: (Score:2)
Here - the owners of the building say it's a shelter for the homeless.
Links, as requested:
First, some pictures (because we all know, 'pics or it didn't happen') a href=http://picasaweb.google.com/jenniferrusherr/AllAboutMe#5250895829943329954>Typical room at the Mission Hotel
Another view [google.com]
Witnesses say that Usher's room looks the same - but messier.
Warning sign in lobby [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
You live in a shelter for homeless people. The people who run the joint say that's what it's for. They know better than you. Just like if you had really gotten a sex change, your doctor would have told you that you still need to get that prostate checked, despite the reduced risk. You're a fake. People saw you walking around in San Francisco when you were supposedly in bed after surgery. Your sad story has changed innumerable times in the last decade. Nobody is buying it.
JENNIFER USHER'S CHEAP SEX CHANG
Re: (Score:2)
How's that prostate, Howie? [google.com]
Making things up? That picture tells it like it is. You were claiming that you passed at work, then, when you wouldn't stop calling post-op transsexuals 'men in dresses" I let everyone know you were a liar, that you didn't pass at work, and you've been pissed off at me since.
None of this would have happened if you had acted like an adult 5 years ago, instead of keeping on with your attacks against others. It's when I turned against you and said "this is wrong" and apologized
Re: (Score:2)
Andrea James on the fake Harry Benjamin Syndrome [tsroadmap.com]
"Harry Benjamin syndrome" (HBS) is a fake disease created by some self-hating transpeople who self-diagnosed as intersex. I had not had any dealings with these people until one tried to recreate a deleted Wikipedia article about this fake disease. After I redirected it back to transsexual
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You spent months attacking me, and I finally left the news group in disgust with you.
Then you attacked other people accusing them of being me. So I popped back in and told you to F.O.
Then I checked back in and you were still lying - including BS about there being some sort of "agreement" over my leaving. You can't tell the truth about anything.
And your pr
Jennifer Usher Delphi Adept (not) (Score:2)
You're so full of it that it's amazing that you can stand your own stink.
If you're so good at it, why, in the last 10 years have you been either homeless, cadging a room in someone else's home, living in a shelter, or renting a single room in a hotel run by the Tenderloin Housing Clinic Mission Hotel for the homeless?
10 years. Not one programming gig. You're not a programmer, except in your own mind. Just like everything else in your life - there's what you say, and there's reality.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You've spent most of the last decade attacking a post-op rape victim online - and she thought the last article was well done. And so are you, so stick a fork in it.
Just stop ROTFL so much - it's bothering the neighbors.
Re: (Score:2)
As opposed to first-hand knowledge - Even beer-goggles won't work [google.com]. JustJennifer aka Jennifer Usher, netkook, works at UCSF, has been living in San Francisco's largest homeless shelter since the middle of the last decade. Failed 'hacker wannabe', failed 'transvestite wannabe', failed 'transsexual wannabe'. Also answers to Lardo the Clown, porkchop, and especially transquisling (make sure to mention 'transquisling' if
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You are disgusting.
Why don't you look up the definition [thefreedictionary.com]of rape [medterms.com] instead of making up your own?
And you know damn well that it had nothing to do with the Thai sex trade. Willow was a lawyer representing financial interests overseas. When the deal went sour, the Thais tried to pin it on Willow. The Canadian government had to intervene.
However, even if it were, as y
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
You trivialized it here. You trivialize it everywhere.
No, rape includes both sexes. And same-sex prison rape is the most under-reported rape going.
I am
Re: (Score:2)
You do this all the time. You've been attacking this person, and many others, for almost a decade, and others have called you out on it [transboutique.com].
As for all that you've accused me of in your post - you're projecting - again.
And then you wonder why nobody agrees with you, nobody l
Re: (Score:2)
This is better. If you spend too much time trolling, you become the trolled. A copy and paste is good. It forces the trollee to read the entire thing and most likely respond in an item by item fashion. What takes you two minutes to develop takes the trollee 20-30 minutes to deal with.
My favorite victims are those who will spend an hour responding to a one or two sentence throwaway comment. My brother is pretty good at these on certain boards. (xpt, f1 forums, and Rennlist are some of his favorite hangouts I
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see how 'transquislings' has anything to do with a Nazi reference. But even assuming it is, and therefore falls under Godwin's Law, making a Nazi reference does not in any way imply that one side or the other has lost a debate. Godwin's Law is merely an observation on the nature of the semi-anonymous nature of online discussion and argument. It says that the level of discourse will devolve the longer it goes on.
Re: (Score:2)
Poor Usher, nobody gives a ****. It would be more interesting if you could tell everyone how many sites have banned you for being a jerk, harassing them, calling transsexual women "men in dresses", etc.
We'd also like to hear more on that medical miracle you claim - about how "true post-op women don't have prostates" even though the doctors don't remove them.
You're a kook. Entertaining for a time, but the difference is that, unlike everyone else here, we have other things to do than to go on about how ev
Re: (Score:2)
Why isn't the prostate removed?
Re: (Score:2)
The prostate isn't removed because there's no need to. The less surgery the better, and who wants to risk being incontinent?
Usher makes this bizarre claim not to have a prostate. The prostate is what develops in XY males, including Usher.
Doctors recommend that m2f patients get their prostates checked because the risk, while reduced, is still not zero, and why take a risk - prostate cancer kills.
So while Usher will try to call it a Skene's gland, it isn't. In fact, Usher has no medical training, and
Re: (Score:2)
Jesus tap-dancing Christ, forced sodomy is NOT rape? That shows it in a way that all of the inside baseball GLBT doesn't that this is a serious wackadoo.
As far as my question, I was wondering if it had something to do with incontinence. As far as removal, if it no longer serves a purpose, why not? But it seems that the presence of estrogen lowers the risk of prostate cancer, or am I just wildly speculating? I'm unsure what other changes are taking place that might result in decreased chances of prostate can
Usher and attacking rape victims (Score:2)
It's a prostate, not a skene gland. Your doctor will ask when the last time you had a prostate exam was.
But the real meat and potatoes - why have you spent almost a decade mis-representing someone's rape, and using it to attack them, both from UCSF (University of California San Francisco) computers while at work, and from home?
Nice mis-use of taxpayer funds by the State of California by a raging transphobe.
Re: (Score:2)
It's worse.
The woman who was raped went to an on-line support forum. Usher has attacked her continually there, calling her a 'man in a dress' and a bunch of other things. Now appearances shouldn't count - some people are less "passable" than others - but if you've seen the pics of Usher you know how Usher is in no position to attack anyone over their looks.
Over the years, we've tried to reason with Usher, and gotten burned.
Usher did many of these attacks from a UCSF computer until we complained. Sinc
Jennifer Usher - It's not rape. (Score:2)
You are insane. Quit making thing up!
You live in California. It's pretty much the same statute as elsewhere: Here's a layperson's explanation: http://www.shouselaw.com/rape.html [shouselaw.com]
Here's the actual law - nowhere does it say anything about sex or gender of the victim, Rape and sexual assault have been gender-neutral for decades. Read it,
Jennifer Uhser, stalker (Score:2)
Everyone saw what you did, and said it was clear to everyone that you were stalking Willow. You tried to spin it, nobody bought it, because we all know you're a sick f***.
Sorry, I don't have time to babysit you today. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Typical Nazi tactic - the big lie - repeat it enough times, and you hope someone will believe it.
Ask the doctors where you work at UCSF - you have a prostate, not a "Skene gland".
http://php.ucsf.edu/PatientEd/MedicalCareofTransexualpts.pdf [ucsf.edu]
Re: (Score:2)
It is San Francisco's largest homeless shelter. Anyone following the links can see that. But keep on with the big lies, you stupid brown-shirt.
Re: (Score:2)
Links, as requested:
First, some pictures (because we all know, 'pics or it didn't happen') a href=http://picasaweb.google.com/jenniferrusherr/AllAboutMe#5250895829943329954>Typical room at the Mission Hotel
Another view [google.com]
Witnesses say that Usher's room looks the same - but messier.
Warning sign in lobby [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I'm just a single white female living in San Francisco living the good life [google.com] JustJennifer aka Jennifer Usher, netkook, works at UCSF, has been living in San Francisco's largest homeless shelter since the middle of the last decade. Failed 'hacker wannabe', failed 'transvestite wannabe', failed 'transsexual wannabe'. Also answers to Lardo the Clown, porkchop, and especially transquisling (make sure to mention 'transquisling' if you want t
Re: (Score:2)
Looked it up and your reply only addresses the first sentence of the paragraph I wrote.
Re: (Score:2)
Blah, blah, blah, blah, "there is a tradtion..." blah, blah, blah.
Like I said, the law itself implies nothing, it is just your curious little interpretation of the actual law itself. I couldn't care less if it is Tom's as well.
Jargon File: kook (Score:2)
Source: WordNet (r) 1.7
kook
Source: Jargon File (4.3.1, 29 Jun 2001)
kook [Usenet; originally and more formally, `net.kook'] Term used to
describe a regular poster who continually posts messages with no
apparent grounding in reality. Different from a troll, which implies a
sort of sly wink on the p
Re: (Score:2)
You claimed for years that you passed at work - and when you wouldn't stop attacking a certain other person (as discussed elsewhere), I proved you to be a liar. Your whole sorry house of lies collapsed after that. You're a kook. You attack a rape victim in a support group - and you did it from UCSF computers at work. You're sick.
You think it's important to "score points." You'll lie, trivialize, twist the truth, anything it takes, because to you, it's a pissing contest and always has been. Lots of us wa
Re: (Score:2)
Funny how that wasn't the story you were telling before - you were claiming that people didn't know. Check your usenet posting history. Or wait a month.
Re: (Score:2)
a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder">narcissistic personality disorder - "The exploitative, sense of entitlement, lack of empathy, disregard for others, and constant need for attention inherent in NPD adversely affect interpersonal relationships." sure sounds like you. You attack everyone, follow them everywhere, post compulsively to get
Remind me of your hot-or-not disaster. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh look, I'm so scared!
Hey porkchop, if it keeps you too busy to attack transsexuals on other sites like you so often do that you've been banned from many of them, I'm sure the world will be a safer place.
BTW - don't think that the stuff you post on slashdot is going to be all that visible - look at my friends list, then look at yours. You can post in your slashdot journal a thousand times a day, it will remain invisible.