Comment Nice in theory, but... (Score 2) 177
All I can see is that the wealthy who controls or develops the AI or the hardware on which it runs and produces work, continues to get richer, while the poor get poorer. People can say UBI, but I don't trust the wealthy to not want more wealth and power at the expense of others--power corrupts. Relying on the benevolence of those who control the means of production is naive. If our current government has taught us anything, we can neither trust business (Elon Musk and other tech bros, oligarchs) nor government to protect the interest of the working (and eventually no longer working because of AI replacement) poor.
The only way I could ever see this working is if there was some system, by design, that prevented any single individual or group from controlling the means of production, e.g. if voters by popular vote could directly shutdown production (without having to rely on a third party, i.e. government, to make it happen). No one would be at the mercy of someone with power over them. Yes, this means there is a built-in vulnerability in the system, e.g. if Russian propaganda influenced enough Americans, they could literally lead to shutdown of production in the US, but that's okay, because people would simply have to go back to manual work (basically our current system), but at least the people would still be in control of production.