Comment Overhaul of what's "bad" (Score 0) 132
In the realm of stats on all the bad things that are possible, some new "stats" are emerging in the realms of studies being done using ArCGIS and other technologies - and instead of the models used to substantiate "current" EPA rules/parameters and thresholds which were based on a single human, single town, etc...
These new studies are looking broadly at entire populations, whole cities and towns when it comes to affects on water, sewage, and so on and the "collective affects" not a mile or two from a site, but downstream, other towns and cities and in some cases affects to other states. An example of this is some of the studies of wastewater in large cities like St Louis, or Grants Pass in Oregon & practically most countries in the EU where it's used extensively to review for the presence of Covid in the waste treatment systems. In the EU - many countries established stronger methods to tamp down the spread where wastewater with Covid was highest.
So back to the fracking topic in the article, we all know it's bad, awful and all the above. The science that even "allows" it to occur once approved is being challenged in many areas now - simply because the laws and regulations that allow it now are 1) vastly underserving the lands, people and environment limited in and 2) because of the archaic laws that don't take enough into consideration currently. The new technology and science will require the impact and affect to vastly broader areas and especially when that meets populations - and then when those in the affected populations carry it downstream, literally. Power plants, factories, pipelines, drilling, mining & the like both existing and new would be the targets - as we know that the "affect" isn't limited to the land beneath it or the sky directly above it.
Enter stage right, those on the SCOTUS - which is currently in favor of removing current regulation and disallowing future science and regulations from being updated, let alone created - because they know where it'll lead. Instead, they're digging in and have all commented to the fact that corporations would continue to win and people, will lose more than ever. Keep in mind that corporations are now on par with people now (Citizens United) -so the next dominoes will fall when it comes to considerations as to the fallout in the rivers, lands, peoples in our country. This battle is relatively easy - do a better job in determining the overall affects of a given project, particular to environmental and human impacts, BEFORE being allowed to build. Regulation is the layer that takes "us" into equation. This is the opposite of how it's been done today however & and we continue to see the ramifications. Fracking is one prime example, cause where else would you see fracking chems in drinking water that can also catch fire. Or, living in Flint much of these 50+ years - seeing it happen and continue to be politicized is a showcase on how these battles will are playing out - with corporations and politics winning and people continuing to lose