Comment Re: Easy solution (Score 1) 74
Majority agrees with the official polish report that blames multiple factors (on both the Polish and the Russian side) as it's often the case in aviation accidents. And let's be painfully blunt - neither Russia nor the ruling party did benefit from the accident. Quite the opposite.
And trust me, crashing anyone in a plane is never a solution. I won't even mention the moral and humanitarian aspects as they are (hopefully) obvious. Even from a Machiavellian point of view, it useless - dead leaders will get replaced by their (often more paranoid) associates, some people will believe in conspiracy theories and radicalise themselves and it will be a lot harder to reach any consensus or change anything.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
[2] http://wyborcza.pl/1,75478,177...
Comment Re:Easy solution (Score 1) 74
Ideas that were also present, at one point, in a certain country to the west of Poland that eventually went to war with the Soviet Union (after signing a deal with the Soviet Union to carve up Poland), so it's not as if this behavior is obviously "soviet" or "pro-Russian".
Both the nazi germany and soviet union shared many authoritarian ideas. Still, I believe that's irrelevant to the original subject.
I fully agree that the ideas I mentioned earlier, don't make PiS 'pro-Russian' per se. However, because it is widely said that PiS looks up to the Hungarian and Russian governments for inspiration, some people assume that PiS is pro-Russian. It is not. It just reuses the ideas.
Because those ideas stand against EU ideals, Poland might get alienated and drift in the general direction of Russia, just as Hungary did. No, it won't leave EU or anything like that. But this drift might weaken EU and people's rights in Poland.
Comment Re: Easy solution (Score 2) 74
Comment Re:Easy solution (Score 1) 74
While at the moment PiS is not pro-Russian, changing political situation might push it in that direction (Hungary already paved the way).
Comment iCloud marketing team seems to be involved. (Score 1) 324
Comment Re:What makes Ubuntu Server unsuitable? (Score 2) 167
The only problem with Ubuntu versus some other offerings like Red Hat is that the support time of the LTS version of Ubuntu is pretty short (only 5 years). It really depends on your project whether this is good enough for your situation. Debian doesn't even have such a LTS version. You only have to guess when Debian stops supporting their OS.
Debian does have LTS support [1] which means that stable releases are supported for (at least) 5 years. You also don't have to 'guess' anything - EOL dates are also provided at [1] (and in a few other places).
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
Comment Re:Specs and price and ordering (Score 1) 71
Comment Re:Can't be right (Score 1) 51
Comment Re:The free market exist for a reason (Score 1) 243
Comment Re:Hopefully... (Score 1) 229
Comment What about the legal part? (Score 1) 483
Comment Re:Awesome game now free (Score 2, Informative) 151
Ah, and as for small laser firing as often as gauss - keep in mind that in CBT board game 1 turn = 10 seconds. Don't try to imagine 1 turn of small laser fire as a single shot (as a matter of fact, multiple war games use "1 turn of shooting != 1 shot" principle) - it simply means that during one turn small laser will do that much damage and produce some heat, regardless of how many times it really did shoot. The same applies to ammo - 1 ammo round means that a weapon can fire during 1 turn - be it one gauss shell or designers-know-how-many machine gun rounds.
Now that I think about it, I wonder if the fast firing weapons in MW aren't more powerful than in a board game - they fire more often and probably deal the "1 turn damage" during a single shot...
Comment Re:captain obvious (Score 1) 366
Comment Re:It isn't as bad as it sounds (Score 2, Insightful) 132
I wonder if they are implying that China is a democracy or just saying that they have the biggest database...