| Subject | Datestamp | Replies | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re:dsniff 2.3 against SRP: anyone tested? | ||||||
| Re:This isn't as bad as it looks... it's worse | ||||||
| Re:Kurt up to his usual tactics | ||||||
| Re:ssh gives a warning if server key changes | ||||||
| Re:Encrypted key exchange | ||||||
| SRP/Strong Password Protocols | ||||||
| attached to Attacks Against SSH 1 and SSL | ||||||
| Re:SRP and patents | ||||||
| Re:Value added for SRP? | ||||||
| Re:SSH is somewhat secure against MTM | ||||||
| Re:Who says SRP is not patented? | ||||||
| Re:Keys tied to computers? Indivviduals? Try both! | ||||||
| Re:Once again, name a major hack due to SSH flaws | ||||||
| Re:SRP is the secure one - cryptographic reasons | ||||||
| Points to consider | ||||||
| Re:SSH vs SRP | ||||||
| Re:Seems vulnerable to spoof atack | ||||||
| Re:Value added for SRP? | ||||||
| Re:Comparing Apples to Oranges | ||||||
| Re:SSH - the only secure solution... for now | ||||||
| Re:Apples and oranges | ||||||
| Re:Does it offer session encryption too? | ||||||
| Re:SSH has been banged on for years | ||||||
| attached to SSH v. SRP | ||||||
Porsche: there simply is no substitute. -- Risky Business
