Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror

Comment irresponsible report? (Score 1) 475

by tjmcmullin (#37615412) Attached to: Big Brother Calls 'Shotgun' In Illinois
so, in reading only the first few comments, it appears that Illinois state is not using the camera in any way, has no intention to do so, never did, and this whole article, from it's catchy title to the contents, is largely in part speculative dribble stirring up fear. terrorism is what some people call it. can we just remove this garbage from the site? slashdot is a great new site but i don't want conspiracy theorists and fear mongering getting the better of what makes front page here... how was this useful for nerds? we know about big brother, yes? was there anything added to the cauldron of conspiracy here today that was newsworthy or is someone just looking for a soapbox in the limelight? sorry, i just don't get this new article...
GNU is Not Unix

GPLv2 and GPLv3 Coexisting In the Same Project? 116

Posted by kdawson from the which-side-of-the-fence dept.
cyclop writes "I am coding a data analysis application in my laboratory that I would like to release as free (as in freedom) software. Moreover I am going to begin a small OSS game that will be based, in part, on GPLv2 libraries. Problem is: in both cases, I'd like to be able to exchange code both with GPLv2 and (future) GPLv3 projects. I have no particular passions about either license — only thing is I don't want BSD-style 'do anything you want' licensing but a copyleft license. I know that GPLv2 and GPLv3 are not compatible. What can I do? Double licensing? Is there a compatible-with-both license? Adding exceptions? What do you think is the best way to address the GPLv2-to-GPLv3 transition without ending up on one or the other side of the barricade?"

Slashdot Top Deals

6 Curses = 1 Hexahex

Close