Comment Re:And? (Score 1) 288
Finally someone's understood the issue at hand. Every company requires you to sign some confidentiality/non-disclosure agreement when you join them. What Apple is achieving with this suit is that they can figure out who was involved, not only at the sites that posted them, but who inside Apple released the info. They just want names and want to set a precedent for the future. If someone hacked into their computer system (I doubt it) to get the info, they would figure that out too. I think it's perfectly fair what they're doing.
Apple's problem in a way is that it just has a cult following and in such a fast-paced market, time is everything. Why not let Apple do it's own thing? Everyone seems to like the outcome (except Cobalt), so why moan about it? It's not going to affect you one bit, unless you own one of those mac rumor sites, which have a pretty bad track record anyhow and are often technically awful. Get over it!
Apple's problem in a way is that it just has a cult following and in such a fast-paced market, time is everything. Why not let Apple do it's own thing? Everyone seems to like the outcome (except Cobalt), so why moan about it? It's not going to affect you one bit, unless you own one of those mac rumor sites, which have a pretty bad track record anyhow and are often technically awful. Get over it!
