Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Well blame Hollywood for creating their own ene (Score 5, Interesting) 310

The only reason Netflix makes their own content is they were being squeezed by Hollywood for higher and higher licensing fees.

Exactly so. The Law of Unintended Consequences in a nutshell. The networks and studios decided to shut down Netflix and monetize their old movies and TV shows on their own. And for a while, it worked. Netflix lost subscribers, and their movie selection was absolutely abysmal. But unlike the networks and studios, Netflix was able to adapt, and it became exactly the type of company that the networks and studios could no longer hurt.

It's such a pleasure to watch Hollywood being devoured by the monster it created.

Comment Re:Poor business (Score 1) 395

In the dark ages (before www), I used to religiously read two or three movie reviewers in my area. After 5 or 6 reviews the lights clicked.

Back in the dark ages, I religiously watched "At The Movies" when Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert were partnered together. Ebert by himself was extremely inconsistent, but when he worked with Gene Siskel, the two of them together usually hit it on the mark. A "two thumbs up" film was almost always worth watching.

It was a real shame with Siskel passed away. Ebert's other partners never matched up to Siskel.

Comment Re:Nothing to worry about (Score 2) 71

It seems to be the same in the the USA (Arizona at least). The police seem to view burglary as an unavoidable fact of life, and burglars seem to never get caught and even if they are, hardly prosecuted (presumably because most of them are actually druggies that just need to steal something to sell, in order to get their next fix).

It's the same in every medium to large city in the entire U.S. Past a certain population size, the police cease to treat property crime as a crime anymore. Burglars have broken into homes in my neighborhood and taken thousands of dollars worth of items, and the police only show up long enough to give the homeowner a report to file with his insurance company. Your stuff is gone, and you'll never see it again. There are well-known serial burglars (generally vagrants and druggies) wandering around my neighborhood who have been arrested dozens of times, and residents are helpless to stop them. Their descriptions and names are common knowledge - nothing is done. They know that as long as they don't assault a resident or use a weapon, they are untouchable. It is a constant source of frustrated discussion on the neighborhood Nextdoor site.

But the problem with tolerating property crime as part of the "cost of living" is that occasionally it leads to something far worse. Case in point: about three weeks ago, a woman living in a recently gentrified neighborhood was stabbed to death by a homeless guy when she woke up to find him burglarizing her condo (she had forgotten to lock her door). Security footage showed the guy looking for unlocked car doors along the street, and then trying out doors in the condo complex. A police precinct station was less than half a mile away, but it might as well have been 50 miles away as far as police patrols were concerned.

Comment Re:Good advice to apply in practice (Score 1) 199

2. Anticipate the impact of human error. Having two accountants, two sets of envelopes, having them memorize the list of winners, is a good thing, but we see here that this failed because when the awards ceremony is live, people might not be as level-headed as they would normally be. There's a lot going on, and the possibility of error as a result of distractions is greater. Ironically, having multiple sets of envelopes is part of the reason why this error occurred, so there must be careful thought toward building the aforementioned redundancy in a way that doesn't inadvertently create additional modes of failure.

The biggest part of the "human error" factor was that the PwC guy who was passed out the envelopes was spending his time on his smartphone, tweeting to his followers. That, more than anything else, led to the mistake.

You can debate about fonts and typography all you want, but if the person who is responsible for handing out the correct envelope is too busy tweeting "OMG THE OSCARS ARE SO COOL! #iamcooltoo" to pay attention to his job, then mistakes are going to happen.

The smartest thing that PwC could do for next year is put people in charge who are not "starstruck" by Hollywood actors, and who will pay attention to the task at hand instead of trying to impress everyone about how important they think they are.

Comment Slashdot hates Uber, just like it hates Apple (Score 1) 179

The Slashdot Uber-hate is right up there with the Apple-hate. No one's buying Apple products any more, are they? Oh, wait ....

While on business travel, I've ridden in taxis where I had my credit card skimmed by the driver, where the credit card machine was "broken", where I've been taken on the "scenic" route to pump up the fare, and even one time when the taxi broke down on a freeway. I've experienced enough horror stories with taxis to last me the rest of my life.

Uber and Lyft have never been anything but a pleasure to use. As a rider, that is what I care about, not about someone's definition of social justice concerning a company they've never dealt with. As long as Uber offers me a good service at a good price, I will continue to use that service. No one is forcing anyone to drive for Uber or ride with Uber.

Now whether or not the Uber business model will succeed is an entirely different question, but that doesn't worry me. As long as the ride comes when I press the button, and I know in advance what it will cost me, and I can get into that Uber vehicle with a reasonable degree of confidence that I won't be cheated (unlike many taxi rides I've experienced), then I will keep right on using them. I suspect that most business travelers will do likewise.

Comment Re:They might but not as a gift. (Score 1) 294

If they do this, it wouldn't be to "curry favor" with Trump, it would be a move to further destabilize the US.

The most insightful statement in this discussion.

Snowden is not an "asset", as he was never a spy for Russia. By now Russian intelligence has long since squeezed any information of value out of Snowden. There's hardly any need for Putin to keep him in Russia, and his value as a propaganda asset is fading.

But the impact of the protests over Trump are not lost on Putin. Returning Snowden without asking for the lifting of sanctions will feed the "Trump is in cahoots with Russia" meme, and make things that much more difficult for the U.S. government.

It would be a smart move, and Putin is no fool.

Comment Re:Last sentence is (almost) BS. (Score 1) 267

Apple already has several ARM powered laptops drifting around internally. I've seen several of them with my own eyes. ..... From what I was told, there's a huge push to get this stuff out the door as soon as they think the market will accept it. That might be in a year, or two years, or three or four, but that's where Apple is inevitably heading. Custom hardware, custom software, total vendor and user lock in.

So ... you've basically just described an iPad Pro with a keyboard and trackpad attached. Plus, it's a laptop that would be useless for software development by Apple's own internal R&D.

My hat is off to you for crafting a scenario that so perfectly matches the "MacOS is becoming iOS!" paranoid meme, and for tapping into the "Apple sucks!" mindset so prevalent in Slashdot, but I'd sooner expect Apple to port Xcode to Windows 10 than turn its entire line of laptops into de facto iPads that are absolutely worthless to the people who have to write the software for Apple products.

I'll be the first to say that I am completely put off by Apple's latest line of so-called "professional" laptops, but there's a big difference between designing a laptop that is ill-suited for professional work versus designing one that is impossible to use at all.

Comment Re:Comparing it to a Rolex? (Score 1) 406

I have to admit a certain amount of ignorance here, but is it possible to get a Rolex for $400?

$400 (or more) is what you'll pay just to have your Rolex cleaned and serviced every few years. Buy the cheapest Apple Watch, buy a good third-party band instead of buying Apple's overpriced band, and your total cost of ownership will be comparable to the cost of maintaining your Rolex, assuming you upgrade your Apple Watch every two or three generations.

Rolexes and Apple Watches are apples and oranges. I own them both, and neither replaces the other. A Rolex may have long-term value, but only if you pay to maintain that value.

Comment It's a great watch, if a watch is what you want (Score 3, Interesting) 406

The Apple Watch is only a "flop" in the sense that people don't need them the same way they need a smartphone. Compared to any other wearable, it's a runaway success, but people don't think about it in those terms, because it is an Apple product.

Personally, I love my Apple Watch, but I'm old enough to be part of a generation that wore watches. I'll still put on my Rolex for dress-up occasions, but my Apple Watch is my go-to daily wearable.

For people who didn't grow up wearing watches, the Apple Watch may elicit nothing but "meh" from them. So be it ... it is not a device for everyone, but it is an excellent device for people who want to wear a watch that does more than tell the time.

Comment Re:No surprises here (Score 1) 61

The last cab I took, the driver asked for my credit card and skimmed my card. That's why it was the last cab I took.

It happened to me too, on a business trip to Toronto. They were clever about it, too .... the second charge came from a different cab company name just a couple of days after my trip, for an amount of money that, at first glance, would seem legitimate. Fortunately I only used that particular credit card for business expenses, so it stuck out like a sore thumb. But I could see where a lot of people would pay the charge and never think about it.

Anyway, that's just one of my bad experiences with taxis; I've got plenty more. :-)

Comment No surprises here (Score 4, Insightful) 61

Despite all the Uber-hate on Slashdot, the fact remains that the average business traveler doesn't care about labor controversies where Uber is concerned. All they care about is getting from point A to point B with a minimum of expense and hassle.

With Uber, I know when a car is going to show up after I press the button on my phone. I know in advance approximately how much the ride will cost. I won't have the driver take me on the "scenic route" just to pump up the fare. The car will be clean and in good shape. The driver and I can view the same route on our smartphones. And if I have any issues with the driver or the ride, I will have a name and an electronic record of the trip.

And best of all, I don't have a driver tell me, "Cash only, credit card machine is broken." I get a real receipt by email, not a blank piece of paper handed to me so that I can put in whatever amount I please, and thereby cheat on my expenses.

So, yes, I use Uber (and Lyft) and will continue to do so whenever I can. I can tell you a dozen different stories of bad experiences I've had with taxis on business trips. Uber and Lyft have never been anything but a pleasure to use.

Slashdot Top Deals

But it does move! -- Galileo Galilei

Working...