Re:Address implies content (Score 0)

From the wired.com article you link to : "Professor Orin Kerr questions whether the decision is about getting this information from an ISP or whether it was from a device installed on a computer surreptitiously. He suggests the latter should require a higher standard, but I'm not sure why? Perhaps it's because that might require law enforcement to enter a person's house?" The writer is not sure why attaching a device to a computer in a home would require a higher standard? Have IQs really dropped so much of late? I give you Amendment IV, Bill of Rights, US Constitution : "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." These are not optional rights, they are inalienable Rights.