Re:Security through lack of reward. (Score 1)

Right. The error in the Security Through Lack of Reward argument is that you can't rely on whatever you think constitutes a reward to a possible attacker. For a lot of attackers, just being vulnerable makes attacking rewarding. The same applies to home intrusions. Sure, you might be safe from people who would want rob you, but that doesn't make you safe from some guy who you pissed off one day and decides to burn your house down.