Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Layoffs (Score 3, Insightful) 72

Maybe Roku has been paying to carry Fox content, or Fox has been paying Roku to carry content (I don't know how their deals work), and now that doesn't have to happen anymore?

Let's do the math:

($Fox + $Payment) + ($Roku - $Payment) = $Fox + $Roku

That's a zero-sum transaction. No $400M savings there.

Comment Re:This is a milestone (Score 1) 75

Making a better battery, or commercializing it, is a milestone. Putting a research battery into an airplane is not a milestone. It's a publicity stunt.

Building a reliable long-range monoplane in 1927 was a milestone. Flying it solo from New York to Paris was a publicity stunt.

Which of these two actions do people remember and celebrate today?

Comment Re:a step too far (Score 1) 346

you sir, are blind, war is never good

What an utterly naive interpretation of world history you have. I can assure you, if you'd been a Jew being rounded up for extermination in WW2 you'd have a different opinion. Likewise, if you were Chinese or Korean being subjugated by Imperial Japan, you'd have a different perspective. There is such a thing as a "just war" even though you somehow ignore the concept. It's usually when your opponent starts the war and is hell bent on eradicating you and your way of life.

Alas, you sit there in perfect safety and comfort, passing judgement on those who sacrificed fa more than you can ever imagine so you could impugn their sacrifices.

Comment Re:Oh look. (Score 1) 346

For now, people can worry about what type of weapons to use and whether or not certain types should be banned.

But in the future, all the debates will be about will be "how do we pick just the right grid squares in which to Kill All Humans?"

Banned for who? And who's going to enforce this ban?

You have to remember any treaty (a) must have signatories that agree to follow it and (b) there must be a method of enforcement. If you lack either of these two conditions, the treaty has no effect.

Comment Re: Oh look. (Score 1) 346

If there was a "total war" America would not exist anymore.

Not sure how you think you could pull that off, but whatever.

We sink your carriers, then we siege your cities.

Again...exactly how do you plan to accomplish this? It's not like Iran hasn't been firing missiles at our carriers this whole time. Yeah, it's a halfhearted effort by the Iranians, but what exactly do you think would happen to Iran if you managed to even damage one of our carriers, much less sink one? I can describe it thusly: the American gloves would come off. Iran would be plastered into oblivion via conventional bombardment, and there's very little Iran could do to stop it. Sure, we'd take losses, but the Iranian regime would cease to exist in totality. America has had this option available to it since day one. We haven't exercised it. Not because we couldn't do it but because we chose not to. Do not mistake restraint for a lack of capability.

Comment So long and thanks for all the circular funding (Score 3, Interesting) 93

The days of unlimited funding are over.

Let's recap. First, VC and mega-tech corporate coffers were the sources of unlimited funding. Compute was bought and essentially offered free or nearly free to even the most voracious users to juice usage stats and hopefully disrupt that too-long-entrenched habit people have of, let me check my notes, "using their brain to think." And to do 30% of the job of a person at 5% of the cost, sure, why not! Four to six months ago, those funds started drying up.

Fortunately, there was circular AI "investments" and "deals" between Nvidia, OpenAI, Microsoft, etc, which of course wasn't funding at all, just moving money between multinationals/hyperscalers to double- or triple-count the value of the money as it changed hands and maintain the air of inevitability by sheer scale of AI investment. Sure, it wasn't real value, but it was good enough to (maybe, if SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic move quickly) give runway for a few IPOs, and heck, when we're only burning through a few billion dollars a month, what's the harm in placing a bet to own the all future labor value?

But now? It looks the CEOs, boards, and shareholders remember they like their present-day selves more than their future-selves (future me? That guy is basically a stranger!), who are really the beneficiaries of these costly bets. So, with no other funding sources, AI companies have no choice but to charge users for compute directly. So now AI can do 30% of the job of a person at 10,000% of the cost.

I think we all see where this is going.

Comment What's the problem? (Score 1) 82

With all of GitHub's great new AI features, it writes all your code for you! It doesn't matter whether the site is up at any given moment; just download your newly completed app at some point then the site is online. You're free to kick back, relax and scroll your social feeds because you don't actually have to do anything anymore. This is truly a golden era!

Slashdot Top Deals

Doubt is a pain too lonely to know that faith is his twin brother. - Kahlil Gibran

Working...