I'd say they are likely based on the fact that there is no specific standout feature, no thing that says to the average end user 'this is why we are better than the competition, choose us over the existing products'.
Ubuntu's standout feature, IMO, is that it's not incumbent Xoogle, Ycrosoft or Zapple
Reverse engineering is innovation? Okay so when China outstrips the United States and defeats the evil Western corporations, who then will they turn to for reverse engineering targets? Also, what is driving this chip to innovate? Who are the competitors for Loongson/Godson? Nobody inside their borders, the government is funding that! That's the problem when your government pays for and decides what you're going to use. Once that's in place, you can sit back and soak up that fat federal funding. Where's the competition going to come from?
Of course nothing happens in a vacuum. Blah blah blah. Let's avoid ALSO slipping into a capitalist vs. communist ideological catfight here. We're talking about processors. First of all, I think it's naive to assume that China will continue to feel that copying is good enough. If supremacy is their agenda, as you seem to be suggesting, surely they'll attempt to take what they learn and run with it in as soon as they are capable. Japan started by imitating US tech, and look what they've done with it (and what the US has done with its own tech in the meantime
Yeah, it be like if an alcoholic coke-head ran for president. No one would ever vote for him.
Oh, the irony of this statement!
the NYT is the lapdog of the liberal left, and not likely to leak anything of importance.
That's the richest comment I've read on Slashdot in a long time. Hooh, boy.
I have ways of making money that you know nothing of. -- John D. Rockefeller