Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Too bad for him (Score 1) 311

Mark my words: if he ends up having a fair trial in Sweden and gets prosecuted via Swedish law for the crimes leveled against him, then serves whatever sentence he receives and goes on his way, I'll eat my netbook. All those of you considering *any* of the allegations made by these young women to be true, watch. Watch what happens the moment he sets foot in Sweden. Just watch. I *dare* you. The U.S. wants him and this is how they're going about getting him.

Comment Re:House of Lords (Score 2) 311

Can we stop pretending that his legal charges have anything to do with rape? It was evident from the getgo that the whole situation in Sweden was a farce and a naked attempt to smear his good name sufficiently that he could be whisked to the U.S. and waterboarded. Let's also stop pretending that his Swiss bank account was closed due to addressing issues or that Paypal, Visa and Mastercard all refuse to process donations for him because... well, they never really did supply reasons for their behavior, did they?

Comment Re:Good (Score 1) 281

I'd say they are likely based on the fact that there is no specific standout feature, no thing that says to the average end user 'this is why we are better than the competition, choose us over the existing products'.

Ubuntu's standout feature, IMO, is that it's not incumbent Xoogle, Ycrosoft or Zapple ;)

Comment The U.S. continues on with its reputation... (Score 1) 276

... as being the litigious laughingstock of the rest of the world. The U.S. is lucky it's still rich enough, for now, that it can afford to let armies of bloodsucking lawyers and lobbyists sap innovation from key industries. How long can that be sustained? Free-market capitalist democracy - what a load of tripe.

Comment Re:"Homegrown"? (Score 1) 185

Reverse engineering is innovation? Okay so when China outstrips the United States and defeats the evil Western corporations, who then will they turn to for reverse engineering targets? Also, what is driving this chip to innovate? Who are the competitors for Loongson/Godson? Nobody inside their borders, the government is funding that! That's the problem when your government pays for and decides what you're going to use. Once that's in place, you can sit back and soak up that fat federal funding. Where's the competition going to come from?

Of course nothing happens in a vacuum. Blah blah blah. Let's avoid ALSO slipping into a capitalist vs. communist ideological catfight here. We're talking about processors. First of all, I think it's naive to assume that China will continue to feel that copying is good enough. If supremacy is their agenda, as you seem to be suggesting, surely they'll attempt to take what they learn and run with it in as soon as they are capable. Japan started by imitating US tech, and look what they've done with it (and what the US has done with its own tech in the meantime :/ ). Taking them as an example, I find your argument re: market competition ironic - while U.S. manufacturing giants like GMC ask for bailouts (who's supping from the teat of government funding?) and stagnate in providing any real innovation, Asian products dominate the U.S. market. The assertion that free market capitalism is at the root of U.S. tech innovation is laughable - U.S. corporations are more interested in profit than innovation, and are bleeding incentives away from their home turf because they can pay less for it in the East. The main reason the U.S. is still on top of the high tech market is that it's a young technology, birthed from the military industrial complex (and how much public funding has gone into that over the last 60 years? Fat government funding indeed. Give me a break). Give it another 20-30 years and we'll see whose economic practices allow for innovation in the global tech industry.

Slashdot Top Deals

I have ways of making money that you know nothing of. -- John D. Rockefeller

Working...