Content publishers don't get settlement-free peering by default. Peering agreements are usually only settlement-free if the traffic is symmetrical or each party receives an equal benefit. Content publishers have to pay for their internet access the same as anybody else, albeit they generally have a little more negotiating power than you or I would.

Yes, now click the button marked 'Search Maps' and see what all of the fuss is about.


Hint: You will now be looking at 'Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial'

/Developer/Examples/Sketch/

All of the files should be in there for you to build it.

They can generate ongoing income because they created something of value to others. Artists most definitely can get royalties if they produce something that others license from them. More than likely if you buy a painting in a store it isn't an original but a licensed reproduction. Joe Taxi-driver is making money from providing a service, if he stops providing the service he stops making money.

Presumably their ID would be tied the the legitimate ticket they purchased and after presenting it they would be allowed to enter.

the interesting bits from the script:

and this makes it ok to write sloppy code? amazon's site doesn't even declare a doctype.


in case you were wondering its my second time on the internet

Not to mention the 253 errors from the W3C Validation site.

It would be nice for a company to be able to test satellite equipment (long term uses) in a short run, inexpensive, environment. 8000 is pretty reasonable compared to the cost of putting a full size satellite in orbit then realizing something doesn't work quite right.

I agree that the right to change the service would be found to be legal, however there are still stipulations to that clause. For some changes the provider has to provide a notice in advance to the changes. There also isn't anyway to know that courts would see the removal of the book as a change to the service. That being the case, this clause is irrelevant.

The question here is whether they can legally reserve that right. Just because it is in the EULA doesn't make it legal. If they can reserve that right, then is this particular action covered by that? This is definitely still debatable.

hey, he could have made a really awesome animated gif, but nooooo

eh, that's just a pretty way of saying, "I'm lazy"

and the link is to an article without a single screenshot....

I think that contains a subset of the real problem. The real problem is people thinking that, because they belong to a certain group (country, religion, secret club), they are somehow better than people not in the same group. Nations and religions are not the problem, it's the idea that "I'm better than you" because of some group.