
I can understand why Microsoft wouldn't want to host GPL3 projects, considering that GPL3 contains clauses that were written specifically to attack Microsoft and Novell (it also contains clauses meant to attack Tivo). Why would Microsoft want to host projects under anti-Microsoft licenses? Anyway, I see no proof that CodePlex doesn't allow GPL3.
So the GPL v3 is not an open source license, right according to bullets 10, as use of the license is predicated by the condition that the platform does not verify that the source code is valid.
Of course, I could be wrong and the GPL v3 can be used on such hardware platforms.
When in doubt, mumble; when in trouble, delegate; when in charge, ponder. -- James H. Boren