Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Software

The Anti-ODF Whisper Campaign 213

eldavojohn writes "Groklaw is examining the possibility of an anti-ODF whisper campaign and the effects it has had on the ODF and OOXML Wikipedia articles. In the ODF article, Alex Brown bends the truth to make it seem like no one is supporting ODF, and that it is a flawed and incomplete standard. From the conclusion, 'So what is one to do? You obviously can't trust Wikipedia whatsoever in this area. This is unfortunate, since I am a big fan of Wikipedia. But since the day when Microsoft decided they needed to pay people to "improve" the ODF and OOXML articles, they have been a cesspool of FUD, spin and outright lies, seemingly manufactured for Microsoft's re-use in their whisper campaign. My advice would be to seek out official information on the standards, from the relevant organizations, like OASIS, the chairs of the relevant committees, etc. Ask the questions in public places and seek a public response. That is the ultimate weakness of FUD and lies. They cannot stand the light of public exposure. Sunlight is the best antiseptic.'"

Comment Return of Hypercomputing... (Score 1) 113

I agree with many comments, this seams so not new... ...on first read it reminded me of "Hypercomputers" by Starbridge systems which [at the time c.2000] had a desktop based on FPGAs boards that matched Cray performance.... and could withstand a Magnum shot through the system (excluding PSU) and still run with minor perf hit.

At the time you could get a demo video of this 'experiment' in action, however I've drawn short on evidence now we're in 2007.... my only trace via Google is this ol' /. article by LordMyren...

http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/04/ 09/1824253&tid=137
"That Star Bridge Systems is still about to unleash a whole new ball game.

*twiddle* any day now gents. honestly, it looks like OpenCores might get there first. ;)

One of they're earlier claims was it was so dynamically reconfigurable you should shoot it with a .358 magnum and it'd still function.

I still dont see how even 100% utilization of FPGA's could so much as touch 10% utilization of a good ole cray. They're both massively parallel, sure, but one of em's got like upteen bajillion processors. A system full of as many top of the line FPGA's as you can cram in there still aint going to be that fast.

Either way, it sounds like some really cool vaporware.
Myren"

N.B. I don't agree with this point in time synopsis, as there was a perf / cost analysis against the Cray and the differential was massive... again anyone with the access to the old whitepapers etc... would be of interest.

Regards,

TheBrit

Slashdot Top Deals

My idea of roughing it turning the air conditioner too low.

Working...