So a lobbyist "think tank" found out that our liberties cost them money (which they never had). That is truly unexpected and shocking.

Have you even read the summary? How would the iPhone do that if they make binary image of the storage? Can it magically format other storage devices as well?

He's still ahead of FBI.

Every person who ever torrented an album would have to listen to it at least 150 times and every single one would have to buy it if they couldn't download it for RIAA reasoning to make sense. But yeah, that doesn't add up.

No, you can't, you're incapable of recognizing disingenuity.

• - One download is one person, because that's how RIAA calculates it. They account for possible sharing between people in their estimates already.
• - Assume album has 10 tracks, thats 150 playbacks of the ENTIRE album for EACH download for this to make sense, not to mention that
• - this is still assuming that EVERY SINGLE PERSON who has illegally downloaded the album would buy it if they couldn't download it.

That's lots of ifs and assumptions for you to call anyone disingenuous without looking very disingenuous, anonymous coward.

How does this add up with 1 illegal download = 1 missed sale?

A big screen that tells me what I should think and listens to everything I say... I'm sure I've read about this somewhere....

You assume that people breaking the speed limit increases the average throughput of the traffic, which is not always the case.

You get someone famous enough to declare it.

Does that actually make sense in your head?

My mistake. Nevertheless, it seems the plan is to make the super heavy lifter reusable, which is one of the key features that makes the plan at least theoretically feasible.

He may not be able to afford a Saturn V, but that's not what he plans to use, he plans to use multi-launch mission using reusable Falcon 9 Heavy. Everything he has done this far suggests he is able to build it. I am not saying he can't fail, but at this point it takes too many unsupported and ill-informed assumptions to just say he isn't going to do it. This is getting a little bit old to be honest. First it was the main engine. Musk isn't going to develop and/or build one. Look at how much NASA spent developing F1! There is no bussiness case for that! Then it was Falcon and reaching orbit. Musk isn't going to develop and build one! At best it's going to end with huge fireball! Look at how NASA spent on putting things into orbit! Musk isn't going to deliver cargo to ISS! Look at how much NASA spent developing rendezvous and docking technology! He can't afford that or build that!. Give me a break. It was never guaranteed that was going to succeed and it still isn't. And I understand that you people may not be his fans. But it would be great if you could, for once, learn the difference between you not wishing that he succeeds and him actually not having chance.

Well constructed and coherent argument, sir.

SpaceX lost one launch, for which NASA will NOT pay as per the contract. What is wrong with your perception of reality? He is very far from not delivering what he promised.

Doesn't make it any less (or more) true.