I loaded up Gnome 3, to see...
I saw gee--gaws, clutter, garbage are all things I don't need.
I need a clean, simple, interface.
Why buy a reasonable screen, to cover it in garbage that says it is more important than what you are trying to find.
If I wanted useless garbage, I would buy 'newspapers.' (well, nah.. even Unity isn't that bad...
Ubuntu, Gnome, Firefox, and a few others I won't use, all think glitz is it.
Like movies today, No talent, no directors of worth, writers that could not have passed creative writing 30 years ago...
But look at the special effect that have nothing to do with reality.
It sucks.
There are several MAJOR pieces of information missing from all the reports on this incident.
Mainly, the Brand (s)of Software involved.
Not the version, just the brand name.
Since 'Linux' was not mentioned, I would guess the same situation that exists in political coverage, is in play.
Anything 'negative' will not mention Microsoft. But, if any other OS is involved, 300 mentions with all the negatives, will occure in a 400 word article.
My bank uses 'Windows.'
They think Netscape 2.0 is a current browser.
They have no mention of Firefox in their documentation.
They tell me they are computer savvy.
BUT... they use Windows.
Want to bet that most of the systems involved in this problemuse Microsoft? (or ALL the systems do?)
I say, pay the bill...
The class action for theft, false advertising, and 20 other laws broken, counting all the people who would qualify...
I am surprised 10,000 college grads are not leaving the ambulances to chase after this one...
I have over 40 years in and around the computer business.
I used punched paper tape, punched cards, manual binary entry (switches and buttons), TTY input, Micr, 4, 8, 12, 16, 32, 60, 64 and sundry odd other bit computers. I have been surfing the net since before enough of the audience was born. I tweaked windows (until I got sick of it at XP) am now running Ubuntu.
I have used PDAs (Palm) and other devices
I am not tech shy.
Big reason I don't use a stupid smart phone?
The technology doesn't scare me. But, I just want an effen phone. I don't want the garbage and lack of security that goes with the stupid 'smart' technology.
Being secure, on the internet, while at home, with what I have and try to use, is not always easy.
If you are ignorant enough to add all the 'Twitter/Facebook-et al' it is impossible. Everything you disclose to 'friends' is also disclosed to 'not really your friends'... and there a thousands of stories out there about that.
I want a phone... not 100 gee-gaws that mean nothing to me. If I need it, some day, I may have a camera handy (DSI XL, you know). But, if I lose my phone my whole life is not in someones hands...
Enjoy... My specialty was computer security... and I knew how to write 'virii' before most of your daddies were born... But, I don't.
This is a blatant socialist attempt to create a national id system. You will end up having to use the id to prove you are allowed to carry a computer, buy a computer, use a computer, let TSA feel your goodies with computer controls. It will give Google, bing/yahoo, and others the ability to cookie and trail you no matter what you do on the net (Keep in mind, I won the arguement in the early 1990s, that cookies could do great harm to your systems, if that is what the setter of the cookie wanted. Some Very Good high echelon people in the computer business scoffed... then the virii started...)
The attempt will end with required to tie your SSN to it so as to make sure they don't miss a trick, while turning tricks screwing us.
The crowd behind this has neither ethics nor morals as we know them...
ANYTHING they want to do, they will.
They are true believers in Al Tekkeya
From the top down.
What is said needs to be done, is contrary to what the current administration and congress (with the numerous terrorist attacks in last year that they don't call terrorist attacks, terrorism or anything related to Islam... with the willing Animal Farm Bleating of the media)
The bottom line is, they don't want anything that works. They just want to blame someone else for their lack of ability, the failures of their agenda, and since fingerpointing works so well...
More attacks are a certainty...
How's your hope and change doing you today??
Quote:
"Who knew leaving a bank of computers on 24/7 costs money?"
Obviously, the following types, who more than likely have the password 'PASSWORD' on their systems (or something like a sticky note with the password on it...pasted to monitor)
1) As noted, the school admin.
2) As not noted, the city and state DOE, who had not set mandatory policies of shutting down non-essential/non-monitored systems.
3) As not noted, the nim-null reporter with glorious hatred for such projects as SETI, and completely in the dark about computers, computer security, computer SOPs of any depth, and with no real journalistic/reporter understanding of ethics, demonstrated by not having contacted SETI, to ask for the other side of the story. But, 90% of reporters are at least this bad (Ask ABC, NBC, CBS and BBC about how long they knew about what is now called 'CLIMATE GATE' before their am/pm news shows did??).
4) More than computer ignorant and journalism/reporting ethics editor. Any qualified editor (of which there are fewer every day, knows to have a 'stop the presses cub reporters' work checked, before going to press, so to speak.
Any programming language is at its best before it is implemented and used.