You just created a strawman.

What jobs were lost specifically? Jobs are lost to automation mostly. Even if we started manufacturing more here they would produce little jobs. We have half a million manufacturing jobs in the USA RIGHT NOW that we cannot find people for.

There was nothing to add for inflation, if it were it would be Biden AND trumps fault.

Its not propaganda in any way. That is not a word you seem to understand. You may not like that it does not show all the other taxes, that does not make this propaganda, nor partisan.

What terms specifically are those?

Compel is a keyword, and until Trump took over Zuck was clear there was no compelling, it was just their choice, and if there was compulsion then Meta could have sued to stop that.

The government cannot compel them to take action, it can however ask them.

In those cases 1A comes into affect, coercion, but that is also ion the government to which google can sue to stop.

Halleck v MNN defined when this is the case defining state action doctrine..

The private entity must perform an action historically exclusive to the government (Marsh) or exercising government power, joint action, over trespass (Logan Valley).

Pruneyard is not about the US constitution, it is instead based on on the California constitution. It holds that the State can extend some protections for a limited amount free speech to people who were otherwise able to be on mall property to do other things, for a small number of orderly persons as long as it does not interfere with normal business operations (which ads would seemingly be a normal business operations.

It also has exemptions for publishers, which all of these sites are.

And to head it off, Section 230 only protects publishers you would not need 230 if you were not a publisher.

Anyone who has read the constitution, or even any 1A jurisprudence, realizes that Americans do not have a constitutional right to free speech with respect to anyone but the federal government. 14A extends that to all governments, just like it does 2A. It does not however extend it to private entities like google. You may not like censorship, but that is a free market problem.

Its very possible. The union in at amazon itself would have more direct power than a union on the 3rd party carrier to raise costs.

So again, Amazon should pay these employees for the rest for their lives, and if they quit operations they break the law, are you trying to lose companies?

Going to love it when your rates go up to cover it for those others?

EVs' second advantage is convenience. Most EV owners will almost never have to fill their cars up at a station. This is because they will charge their cars at night, in their own home garages or driveway.

This is only a convenience when you do not need to travel longer than the range of your vehicle or you have power at home. If either of those 2 things are true then it becomes a hinderance.

That is not a no true Scotsman fallacy. A subsidy has a definition, it does not fit the definition, however what you did was "move the goal posts" from the USA to other countries.