Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Same old Microsoft (Score 1) 557

Somebody needs to be fired immediately.

A comment you would expect from some kiddie gamer who's never been outside of his mommy's basement. Here's a tip for you, some governments have regulations about the time you are required to retain data if you are a business. If you do not follow such rules, you are not going to stay in business for very long. Some of the documents we deal with we have a 25 year retention requirement.

Yes you are.

Considering Linux is the deployment platform for my main product, that's a moronic statement, but hey, nobody expects a 12 year old kid to utter non-moronic statements when communicating about business, so that's OK.

Linux has billions of users in its handset

Try to google the concept of "context". This part of the thread is entirely about the desktop. I have elsewhere explained why Linux on handsets is not only an excellent platform, but hugely successful. I even explained what Google has done right that Linus did wrong assuming Linus wanted Linux to succeed on the Desktop (something Linus never cared about). I did so in my first posting. Linux is an excellent OS for a lot of things, but on the desktop it's a joke.


Where it is decent, but can't hold a candle to, for example, QNX. Sadly, the competition killed the vastly superior QNX.

Growing rapidly

Not on the desktop, and it never will grow - rapidly or otherwise.

Hang yourself up on a hook in the barn

When talking to adults, please seek the assistance of other adults to explain (obviously) very complicated things like "context" to you.

Comment Re:Same old Microsoft (Score 1) 557

You need to lay off those magic mushrooms. Linus has nothing to do with user space applications on Linux.

I know. That was my point. The UI is, for 99.99999% of all users, an integral part of the operating system. In fact, for the vast majority of the population, the UI IS the operating system. Linus decided not to get engaged at all in neither the discussion nor the drive and direction of the UI, and consequently Linux was doomed to fail, from day one, on the desktop. It will never be relevant on the desktop as long as this quite essential part of the OS is dealt with in the dictatorial manner Linus does everything else. For Linux to succeed on the desktop it needs ONE UI, on all distributions. Any alternative must be banned, and the makers should not be allowed to call their product Linux. Simple as that. If Linux is to succeed on the desktop. If Linus doesn't care about Linux on the desktop, he should continue as now.

BTW, Krita is already a better tool for artists than Photoshop

Krita is great, but it doesn't have the professional support of Photoshop. Can it be used as a replacement for Photoshop, for the individual artist, probably, for the professional who spends a significant portion of his life sending work to others and working on the projects of others, probably not yet.

Your rant about Libreoffice is just pure braindamaged rambling

And there you demonstrated why Linux is always going to fail on the desktop. OO/LO has several major issues with formatting MS Word documents. What does this mean? It means that for anyone who has a professional relationship with documents, OO/LO is 100% useless. My department has some 2.5 million Word documents, of which a good percentage will not be formatted properly in OO/LO. So, how are we going to find out? Are we going to open all of them manually and check?

It's always funny when children who use their computers as toys try to inform people who use them professionally what is and is not. Linux is very good for software development. Since the late 1990s, most of my work has been developing Java software for deployment on Linux. The past five or so .Net has been slightly more important, but my responsibility is still a fairly large Java app. I currently use Eclipse for development, but I use it on Windows, since it works a lot better on Windows than on Linux. I have done a few minor things in Rails, and also some stuff in Python. Rails used to be far better on Linux than on Windows, but that's evened out.

I am not a Linux hater, but on the desktop, Linux is a pathetic joke compared to every single other operating system.

Comment Re:Is it possible... (Score 1) 557

I suppose are least Sharepoint have fixed that incredibly fucking stupid (yes it deserves a great deal of profanity) design choice of embedding the documents in the database. They just did not think that people would be using multi-gigabyte sized files did they?

I don't use Sharepoint, so I could not possibly comment. I don't see a problem storing documents in a DB though, Oracle supports from (depending on how you set it up) 8TB to 128TB in a blob, so there should not be a significant issue with it. Not that I've tried of course, but still. In MS SQL one should (could) use FILETABLE, which again doesn't restrict beyond file size limitations.

Comment Re:My business went Linux, then back to Windows (Score 1) 557

Well the main reason is the desktop APIs are not good enough and the ABIs aren't stable

Also GNOME or KDE or plain X? For a while KDE is the most popular, then it's GNOME, not to forget every single other controversy that some developers need to relate to. As a third party software developer that is insane.

If Linus had required a single standard user interface for Linux way back when, Linux on the desktop would probably have been a reality. Choice and options are good for geeks. They are bad for everybody else, and the main reason Linux is never going to be a player in the general computing space. On Android there is one UI (with some possible customization) to program against. If the Android UI and programming situation was the same as on Linux, Android would have had a smaller market share than Windows Phone.

Comment Re:Is it possible... (Score 1) 557

Why twist requirements to match a package?

The requirements were not twisted to fit a package, they are a combination of requirements imposed on the company by laws and regulations, and the consequences of these. Some of these are:

  • Documents sent (out of house) can never (for a minimum of 25 years, longer for some types of documents) be altered or deleted.
  • All versions of a document sent must be available, also drafts.
  • Signed documents must never be deleted or altered. In any way. Internal or external
  • Incoming documents must be stored for a minimum of 25 years
  • Incoming documents can never be deleted or altered by anyone.

Not twisting requirements here. Regulations have been in place for more than 50 years (except for items on digital signatures).

Comment Re:Is it possible... (Score 1) 557

There are many others like it

I am no fan of Sharepoint, but for usability (when the poor admins and developers have finished their job) has features that are fantastically useful for Windows users, tight integration with Office, for example, enables many features that are incredibly useful. DAV for directly editing Office documents work very well, for example, which can not be said for a lot of other platforms. The solution is also extremely well integrated with the Dynamics platform, particularly the CRM product. Again, this is fantastically useful for the end user, and nobody has anything similar.

Comment Re:Wait until they need to move to a new Windows b (Score 1) 557

Azure is a server OS that has nothing to do with consumer Windows

Azure is Windows Server. Windows Server and regular Windows are built on the same core with some parameters changed on Windows Server to prioritize differently than what is required on a client OS. You should cure your ignorance before continuing.

Please note, there is also an amount of Linux servers in Azure, but these were added to the platform subsequent to Apple moving to Azure and are not used by Apple.

Comment Re:Wait until they need to move to a new Windows b (Score 1) 557

Again, this is in the absolutely simplest sense. Prior to this the admin has, of course, used System Center or similar, to make sure that each user can only run the applications he is allowed to run, and that those apps are in fact installed on the PC when the user logs in etc...

Now, to your repeated jab at Windows, why does Apple run its entire iCloud infrastructure on Windows (Azure and AWS)? If Windows is as bad as your Fan-boy religion tells you,wouldn't that be counter-productive? Which do you think needs the better stability and up-time, iCloud or the toy you use to play games on?

Comment Re:Is it possible... (Score 1) 557

internal network disks

Shared disks are Evil (TM). You should get away from that terrible, terrible idea immediately!

I need to have access to all the documents you create, no matter where you put them. When you change them I need to have access to all the previous versions of said document. If you sign it digitally I need to be able to lock the document in such a way that you can never change it ever again under any circumstance. If you store documents that you ship to customers or clients on your local hard drive, I will have you fired.

These are the rules in many of the enterprises I currently work with. These types of requirements will be more and more common. People are not using document management tools to make it easy to share documents with others, they use them to comply with the law.

Comment Re:Wait until they need to move to a new Windows b (Score 1) 557

Change over from the old Windows Live email

Are you serious? We're not talking about upgrading some kid in his basement from Windows 7 to Windows 10.

wait while user thrashes through every file cabinet and closet box

If you are an administrator in an Enterprise, this sentence alone should get you fired on the spot for gross incompetency

ld Mac to a new Mac

Sigh, another MacTard that is clueless about Enterprise requirements.

Comment Re:Same old Microsoft (Score 1) 557

Sigh. This has nothing to do with Gates. This is entirely the fault of Linus Torvalds, and only him. Linux could have had at least the desktop presence that Apple has, but due to Linus' decisions way back when, it doesn't. Here is the reality: There are no apps for Linux, the ones that are created to mimic the Windows/Apple equivalents are not equivalent. They are lacking. From Office to Photoshop, Linux have no viable alternatives. OOffice/LOffice can't format the documents we already have, nor the ones that are shipped to us. GiMP is not on par with PS by any stretch. Illustrator has no functional alternative. Linux can't compete on the desktop for an enterprise or a Municipality, that's the simple fact. It's all the fault of Linus.

If you wonder what he did wrong way back when, ponder the difference of two instances of Linux, Android and "regular" Linux. Android has a huge market share. It has an enormous amount of apps. What is the main difference for a developer between Android and Linux. Again, for a developer.

Comment Re:My business went Linux, then back to Windows (Score 1, Informative) 557

The problem is as follows. You are a kid. You play with your home computer and use it as a toy. Most enterprises, though probably nowhere near as sophisticated as you are, are not. They have to use software that works. Most of the time, preferably all of the time, on the platform they chose. I work for a small/medium enterprise and we use, among a lot of others, the following apps that have no proper alternative on Linux:

  • Photoshop - no real alternative on Linux, no, seriously. Not for work. Seriously, GiMP is not an alternative.
  • Illustrator - again, no matter what they claim, no real alternative on Linux.
  • Office - sorry, Libre/Open doesn't cut it. There is no way we can re-open 25 years worth of documents and convert them manually where the formatting fails in OO/LO. A large number of these documents are signed digitally and we are not allowed to change them at all.
  • A number of industry-specific applications that we have no control over, but have to use.
  • ... and lots more

Enterprises and municipalities have completely different requirements from their software, and Linux simply doesn't deliver.

Interestingly, Apple has a tiny, tiny market share on the desktop, and still a lot of applications are developed for OSX (MacOS now I guess). Didn't even happen for Linux. The fault lies 100% in the lap of Linus, and his choice way back when, is the main reason that Linux didn't, and never will, be a player on the desktop. Can you guess what it is? If not, consider what the main difference between Android and Linux are for an independent software developer. There is one huge one, and that's the main reason Linux thrives on mobile and never will on the desktop.

Slashdot Top Deals

Promising costs nothing, it's the delivering that kills you.