I personally feel if they held off and introduced Windows 95 with the same "upgrades" as Windows 98, it would have been better. I am surprised NT 4.0 was not mentioned. Flame-bait aside, I used that before I went to Windows 95, and I personally had a better overall experience. All I did was do term papers, go on a few BBS's and my system really was fine doing next to nothing. Everything since then has been pretty much a fix upon a fix IMHO. I haven't really "experienced" much of an improvement, and the GUI has generally looked the same since I was at NT 4.0 give or take a few modifications here and there. I went OSX a few months back, and that works for me too. It seems whenever I introduce games to any environment I am in, that's when things get unstable. Since I used to work for a gaming company, I generally blame the game makers themselves for not doing a thorough enough QA process before a release, but I understand ultimately a lot of things get fixed after a few patches. Windows 95 pretty much brought over the Windows games (more than they had ever been), so I guess I can agree. XBOX 360 is doing alright, so maybe that's why it's Bill Gate's high point. I say stick to a console for games, though.