Comment Re:The summary is, of course, wrong. (Score 2) 354
Comment Re:Digital Signatures (Score 1) 169
Comment Re:Can't back up all your bluster, eh? LMAO! (Score 1) 169
Despite all your "big talk" & trying to put me down, you haven't been even a FRACTION of as well noted in the art & sciences of computing as I have...
On some level, this is true. Anonymous Coward has done a LOT of stuff over the years.
Comment Re:Strange (Score 2) 395
Comment Re:what? linuxconf? (Score 0) 539
linuxconf was the crappiest piece of shit I have ever seen and im glad its dead and gone.
This is one of the best comments I have ever read.
Comment Re:We don't use sudo? (Score 1) 592
There are a hundred things wrong with this scenario. I know. That's why I quit. I don't need to hear them all. Mind the forest, not the trees.
Comment Re:Keep up or shut up (Score 1) 785
Comment Re:I loved the original, but.. (Score 1) 412
And every computer shown in the movie was Unix based...
% whoami
flynn
EPIC
Comment Re:So, how long before... (Score 0, Offtopic) 577
Thankfully, I can think of nothing else that will get the average American more in a tiff than their chosen source of entertainment suddenly not working.
Don't mention gay marriage or legalizing pot. I may be slightly off topic here, but only
If only we could become the archetypal American, Joe the IT guy, as opposed to Joe the plumber.
Submission + - Webvention Demanding $80k for Rollover Images (arstechnica.com)
Comment Re:Undercover work is spying, is violating privacy (Score 1) 240
I own a car. Yes, I am about to make a car-Facebook analogy. I am very sorry.
If you look at my car, you haven't violated my property rights. If you write down my license plate, you haven't violated my property rights. If, from my bumper stickers and whatnot, you determine that I have a kid named Billy who plays football, a daughter named, Billy, who plays cello, that one of my kids is an honor-roll student (Billy, most likely), that I have a wife, that I most likely voted for Ralph Nader in 2004, and from the make and model of the car ascertain with reasonable certainty which socio-economic bracket I fit, you still have not violated any of my Constitutional Rights. Would it be creepy? Yes. The same is true of gathering info on Facebook, message boards, etc.
However, if you set your privacy settings and they circumvent them, that's totally different, and may fall under DMCA protection, since "You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings." [Facebook terms of use: http://www.facebook.com/terms.php ]
Submission + - FCC approves changes to cable box rules (thehill.com)
Comment Re:Undercover work is spying, is violating privacy (Score 1) 240
Courts have ruled that there is no expectation of privacy for e-mail. It's not a far stretch to say that covers Facebook and other social networking sites as well. It immediately includes those sites when the user has e-mail notifications enabled.
It's not spying. Maybe information-gathering. We can only call it spying if they're actually playing "I spy."
I spy with my little agent eyes, something slutty.