Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Years needed to undo the stupidity (Score 1) 307

First, as you do not attempt to defend it I assume that you admit that "sponsoring other countries"

Incorrect. As to your second point, I won't dignify that TDS drivel with a response.

OK, then. My first point - that the US isn't sponsoring the Canada by buying from them - is of course correct. By not recognizing that - or that tariffs aren't paid by foreign countries, but by US residents and businesses - it seems like you are the victim of TDS: Believing everything he says, and following it.

Comment Re:Years needed to undo the stupidity (Score 1) 307

Your view on trade is warped by stock-market investor perspective, where trade is flow of goods and increased productivity due to a local specialization. That view obscures that reducing labor costs is directly tied to reducing worker's quality of life. Shipping jobs to foreign countries may be good for shareholders, but it is not good for blue collar workers. Likewise, tariffs might not be good for the shareholders but if they bring jobs back to US they are good for blue collar workers.

First, as you do not attempt to defend it I assume that you admit that "sponsoring other countries" (in this context Canada) is flat out wrong - just as wrong as claiming that other countries pay the tariffs, rather than Americans. Trump is economically illiterate, and others who know better - e.g. the secretary of the treasury. - don't dare to correct him.

Second - most of the countries Trump hate have better conditions for blue collar jobs than the US. Including Canada, Europe, Japan, etc. Public healthcare, vacations, sick leave, unions, and better pay. China and other poor countries (e.g. Bangladesh, India) differ here. As for tariffs bringing back jobs - they also make goods more expensive for everyone, and of course loses a lot of jobs that are exporting goods. I'm looking for a car - it was never going to be a US car, obviously -not good enough - but these days being assembled in the US are also disqualifying. Just as I paid extra to avoid US products for a rehabilitation last summer.

Free trade leads to better outcomes across the board. If the US - the "original free market nation" - can't compete, they need to look at the reasons. More STEM and less stupidity ("MAGA", conspiracy theories, antivaxxers, birthers, etc) is a good start.

Comment Re:Years needed to undo the stupidity (Score 1) 307

I mean how insane is it that our Government made the decision that in 2026 business with CHINA was a safer bet than business with the USA? Madness.

It is madness that PM Carney decided that antagonizing US is the right move for Canada. All heated rhetoric aside, Canada currently enjoys one of the lowest tariffs of any country while still enjoying its domestic protectionism for dairy/etc. and while not having to spend any money on military that afford many social programs that are above and beyond what is available in US. You might not like to admit it, but US subsidizes Canada's standard of living a great deal and reduction in these subsidies is warranted.

Trump antagonized Canada, not the other way around by talking about Canada as the 51st state, and trying to pressure them into his failing state by tariffs not respecting earlier agreements. When you're antagonizing everyone, don't be surprised if they look for other partners.

Comment Re:Hopefully this kills them (Score 1) 307

Many other countries are still subject to the whims of communist enemies in the WHO.

Throwing around the word "communism" doesn't make it accurate. Sure, China is run by the communist party but it's not very communist anymore - they mostly left that behind in order to have economic growth. Today, it's more like a dictatorship where you can get rich, do most things, and own most things as long as you don't threaten the power of the ruling class (AKA "the communist party"). And beyond that, there isn't a lot of communism around - fortunately. It was a complete economic and humanitarian failure, and should be on history's scrap heap alongside fascism and nazism.

Comment Re:Backwards into stupidity we go (Score 1) 307

It's unfortunate for Americans that didn't vote for this nonsense have to live through the experience of knowing our country is now a villain on the world stage. There have always been things to be ashamed of, but until now it's always been easy to at least convince yourself the US does more good than bad. That is unfortunately the past now.

It should be noted that "not voting for this nonsense" isn't the same as not being a part of it - the people who thought "I don't like Kamala", and didn't vote for "sane person with whom I disagree with a lot" when the opposition was Trump are also at fault. Not opposing Trump is just pure insanity, he's speedrunning the US into 1930s Germany and making "idiocracy" look like a movie magically brought back from the future.

Comment Emissions needs to be tracked at the destination (Score 1) 31

Emissions need to be tracked at the destination, not at the source. These statistics are just as bad as people thinking "oh, Norway stopping production of oil and gas would lead to lower emissions". In reality, it would just give more money and influence to nations that are almost universally bad - with the exception of Canada, Norway, and the UK they pretty much all are.

Another "sideeffect" of measuring this way is that e.g. Italy, Ireland, and Spain would be considered "zero emission"... which they certainly aren't.

We do need to lower usage of fossil fuels dramatically, but we need to do so by building green energy - nuclear, solar, wind - as well as improving technology. The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.

Comment Re:Carbs (Score 2) 141

I may yet see the total collapse of the US at the hands of the Democrats in my lifetime. And I doubt I have 2 more decades left in me.

This makes no sense whatsoever. For one, you are seeing the collapse of the US in real time at the hands of the republicans right now: Military threats against allies, rewriting history (Jan 6th), turning the GOP into a cult, threats against media outlets criticizing Dear Leader, constant lies, corruption on a scale never seen before in democracies, murders of citizens, sanctioned masked gangsters operating in the streets similar to the SA in Germany in the 20s, killing of foreign people in boats far away from the US with no evidence of anything, unsanctioned (by congress) military actions for oil, banning tourists if they have criticized Trump, etc etc..

That aside, this is not why malls are struggling. They are struggling because a lot of trade has moved online. In addition, whole categories of traditional goods are almost eliminated by new technology - streaming of audio and video killed off most of the record and movie stores (and are working on cinemas), video games are mostly sold digitally, books are both less popular and a sizable chunk is just digital etc.

As an actual conservative, the whole transformation of the GOP from a somewhat conservative party to a right wing populist party and then to a nutjob cult is weird and frightening.

Comment Re:"Massively Popular" (Score 1) 51

This just points to how much MTV dropped the ball in regards to what was once their core business. The internet came about but they kept just plugging along with the old business model like the world wasn't changing around them. They didn't have to cede this part of their business to Youtube, they chose to by doing nothing to address changing consumer habits.

MTV dropped music videos and migrated to crappyvision (reality shows) many years before YouTube was founded - they started in the 90s and finished around 2000. No music, just cheap junk for idiots.

Comment Re:Artificial Idiocy (Score 1) 65

Google's Gemini app now has more than 650 million monthly active users, compared to OpenAI's 800 million weekly active users.

Apparently not intelligent enough to convert numbers into the same unit before comparing them.

You can't convert the numbers. To illustrate - having 800 million weekly active users does not mean they have more than 3.2 billion monthly active users. Many of these users would be counted multiple times if "converting" that way.

Comment Re:I thought we were saving the planet? (Score 1) 195

Oh come on. How many British drivers do a significant proportion of their annual mileage in the Republic of Ireland? I'd be amazed if even 0.1% of British drivers do more than 3% of their mileage in Ireland.

3% of the British population lives in Northern Ireland , and I wouldn't be surprised if many of them drove more than 3% in Ireland - work, business trips, visiting family, weekend getaways, holiday properties etc. We have a similar border here - Norway / Sweden - and you have a lot of that kind of traffic.

Comment Re:Routine cash grab + warning to SV donors (Score 0) 45

I don't think this is culture war, I think it's legitimately about protecting kids.

The comparison to Facebook and Twitter is not great because those platforms aren't for kids (but I'm all for lawsuits against them as well).

And as for 32 lawsuits being cash grabs or not enough: ok if you say so, I'm not going to worry about your kids if you're not.

If they cared about kids, they'd restrict guns.

Comment Re:Texas? (Score 3, Informative) 45

Imagine if every state in the union sued a corporation.

I am not familiar with US law but should there not exist a federal bureau of investigation (or FBI for short) for such cases?

Well, there was - but it currently suffers from some issues: the Trump-Epstein shutdown, incompetent partisan leadership, and being reallocated to be an instrument of revenge on people Trump don't like.

Slashdot Top Deals

The solution of problems is the most characteristic and peculiar sort of voluntary thinking. -- William James

Working...