Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Needs more... (Score 1) 124

Because they don't think about what they're saying - it's just an automated, impersonal response with no meaning to them. They're just going through the motions. Which makes it even more rude.

Language evolves over time. The meaning behind certain words, terms and even emphasis changes. I'd suggest that they do know what they're saying but you haven't kept up with the changes.

Comment Re:Needs more... (Score 2) 124

Nope. "You're welcome" is akin to "I'm pleased to be of service." "No problem" is like "I wasn't bothered _too_ much to do what I'm paid to do."

That would be your opinion from your own generational bias. I've worked with multiple generations of individuals and have spoken with them about this exact topic. I'm not giving my own opinion, just using my own words to describe what they've told me.

Comment Re:Needs more... (Score 2) 124

And penalize them when they say "no problem." It's your job, of course it's not a problem.

Saying "you're welcome" and saying "no problem" are Generational differences. The older generations say you're welcome, meaning the employee went out of their way to do something. Saying no problem for the younger generation means they were happy to help and that it's all part of their job. I'd prefer whichever makes sense to the person saying it as long as it's not said in a rude manner.

Comment Good idea but..... (Score 5, Insightful) 69

Would this apply equally to all applications including Microsoft's own? If not, this is yet another violation. Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Office, Outlook, etc. are all some of the largest perpetrators of this behavior. Windows itself is a large perpetrator of this same behavior and repeatedly ignores user choice.

Comment Re: Noble, but missing one key thing (Score 1) 69

If it was spent that way what we would have is 30 different OSS solutions as each team would splinter as they argued what is the best approach and what should be standard, each one would be incompatible with every other one and they all would be missing a subset of essential features. While Teams is an ugly beast, what it does well is integrate and provide the basic essentials needed from labelling and meetings, calendar integration, chat, voice, video, team channels and permissions etc etc.

There's a video chat feature addon for Nextcloud that integrates into the built in calendar. Both integrate into the built in email application with a Sharepoint alternative addon, etc etc etc. Matrix already isn't the only solution but it's definitely a good one.

Comment Re:Can they? (Score 1) 69

1. AD is just LDAP, rebranded. 2. SMB is horrible. NFS is better, and surprisingly viable for data centres. For home use, SFTP seems to be the way to go. 3. Microsoft didn't invent email. 4. Honestly, I never used SharePoint. And Confluence is something I avoid after having used it. 5. Microsoft didn't invent git, or gitweb. They bought GitHub for obvious reasons, it is very central to the JavaScript ecosystem. But if you really need the SVN workflow for git, there are plenty of alternatives, like GitLab. 6. Something like Chef, Puppet, or Ansible? 7. DRM does not provide any security, it is just a defect. You want Unix permissons, just use Unix permissions. 8. Citrix is a nightmare. You need RDP, there are secure open source solutions. And X11 has network transparency as part of the core protocol. 9. Microsoft didn't invent GPG keyservers, and most mail user agents can do encryption transparently. Outlook being one of the exceptions.

Teams and XBox are the things that are keeping people using their Microsoft accounts. Teams has alternatives, like Jitsi and Matrix, but they are not interoperable with Teams. Microsoft Office is also something people cling to, even though LibreOffice can do the same, better, and without requiring any retraining.

Matrix has the ability to hook in compatibility with Teams but it's paid. If the rest of the world (other than the US) is already switching to something Open Source and better, why not just switch with them?

Comment Re:Can they? (Score 1) 69

1. AD/Entra - Zentyal is a drop in replacement for AD, can be administered with the same tools as standard AD and can work more easily with platforms other than Windows as well. 2. SMB is freely accessible on every major OS platform and isn't the only one 3. I've seen so many issues with Outlook/Exchange it's not funny. Most users I've had have wanted to use something like Google Workspace instead if for no other reason than to get away from the nightmare of Exchange. With that said, why not just stick with the standard IMAP? 4. Sharepoint is fine but there are plenty of alternatives for each feature. If nothing else, use NextCloud to replace much, if not all, of the features. 5. This goes to my own personal philosophy. Open Source the world. 6. MDMs are all over the place. The only real benefit of Intune over the others is when using Windows devices as it's basically built in. 7. Encryption works well enough. 8. Tried OpenNebula with Guacamole integrated yet? It should suffice for this point. 9. GPG is more about training your users. Annoying but worth it. Not everything is there but most of your list is taken care of.

Comment Re:yes, and (Score 1) 68

My local walmart has been disrupted by this for months. Not clear why it takes months to install chargers, except probably the electric company drags its feet.

This makes perfect sense: they have plenty of unused parking because people now get stuff delivered or picked for them, so parking dwell time is nil. However, I find it hard to believe that it will bring EV drivers into the store. But maybe.

This largely depends on price and speed. I drive a 2018 Bolt EV. If I'm lower on charge, I can easily sit there for 45-60 minutes. Reduce the speed of the charger and it can be comparable for others. Now reduce the price of the charger and the speed doesn't matter as much. You may as well shop for your necessities at the same time so you'll get multiple things done at once.

Comment Re:Probably one station per state (Score 1) 68

Many (most?) WalMarts already have Electrify America charging spots. They are simply cutting out the third party.

This could potentially be good since WalMart would now be directly responsible for maintenance of the equipment, and if they are unavailable it reflects poorly on them directly. =Smidge=

I'd add in that it's much more likely to have EV chargers at WalMart if they own them outright.

Comment Re:It's the quickest to build (Score 1) 36

Installing solar during construction of the Data Center would arguably be faster, easier and cheaper. Install batteries (they already have backup batteries for the servers required to do the work) and you no longer need to worry about night time use.

The datacenters I've worked in basically had UPS to keep things running till the generators kicked in. I doubt enough UPS power to last all night every night is common, that would require vastly more batteries.

While it does, the costs for those batteries would not exceed the cost of building a dedicated power station+running of that power station+lawsuits for the fumes, pollution of the local water table, noise pollution that would come from having that dedicated standard power station.

Comment Re:It's the quickest to build (Score 1) 36

Gas turbines probably use fewer acres of land then the equivalent solar farm would and they work 24/7. Not saying solar+wind+batteries isn't a better idea but it's not hard to see why someone might setup a gas power plant instead. Depends how the laws and their personal feels about climate change come into play.

You're thinking wrong here. Solar doesn't need a dedicated area. Install it on the roof or over parking. Both have benefits and, in the case of installing over parking, it even gives you shade and protection from the elements. Even leaving out climate change, using solar means much less maintenance costs, no charge for the electricity, likely production of more electric than is actually used and the ability to continue going when other locations are in black out. We just need to push this with financial arguments seeing as too many corporations seem to actively want to destroy the planet for higher profit margins.

Comment Re:It's the quickest to build (Score 2, Insightful) 36

Gas turbines are a well developed technology, and are quick to build. Companies keep looking toward nuclear, but building that is a far longer process. Gas may just be an intermediate step, and will be replaced with cheaper and more sustainable options in the future.

Installing solar during construction of the Data Center would arguably be faster, easier and cheaper. Install batteries (they already have backup batteries for the servers required to do the work) and you no longer need to worry about night time use.

Slashdot Top Deals

Science may someday discover what faith has always known.

Working...