Comment Re:I'd pick GrapheneOS (Score 1) 27
Actually secure.
I'd go more for a Linux based mobile operating system. Ubuntu Touch has made large strides in this field. So has Droidian.
Actually secure.
I'd go more for a Linux based mobile operating system. Ubuntu Touch has made large strides in this field. So has Droidian.
Because they don't think about what they're saying - it's just an automated, impersonal response with no meaning to them. They're just going through the motions. Which makes it even more rude.
Language evolves over time. The meaning behind certain words, terms and even emphasis changes. I'd suggest that they do know what they're saying but you haven't kept up with the changes.
Nope. "You're welcome" is akin to "I'm pleased to be of service." "No problem" is like "I wasn't bothered _too_ much to do what I'm paid to do."
That would be your opinion from your own generational bias. I've worked with multiple generations of individuals and have spoken with them about this exact topic. I'm not giving my own opinion, just using my own words to describe what they've told me.
Self reflection would do you wonders. Maybe your food would have less spit in it.
I wish I still had mod points for this comment.
And penalize them when they say "no problem." It's your job, of course it's not a problem.
Saying "you're welcome" and saying "no problem" are Generational differences. The older generations say you're welcome, meaning the employee went out of their way to do something. Saying no problem for the younger generation means they were happy to help and that it's all part of their job. I'd prefer whichever makes sense to the person saying it as long as it's not said in a rude manner.
For what it's worth, I do see Teams asking for OS location, camera, and mic permissions, but not other Office programs.
The last time I looked, Teams was installed by default in Windows 11. Has that changed?
If it was spent that way what we would have is 30 different OSS solutions as each team would splinter as they argued what is the best approach and what should be standard, each one would be incompatible with every other one and they all would be missing a subset of essential features. While Teams is an ugly beast, what it does well is integrate and provide the basic essentials needed from labelling and meetings, calendar integration, chat, voice, video, team channels and permissions etc etc.
There's a video chat feature addon for Nextcloud that integrates into the built in calendar. Both integrate into the built in email application with a Sharepoint alternative addon, etc etc etc. Matrix already isn't the only solution but it's definitely a good one.
1. AD is just LDAP, rebranded. 2. SMB is horrible. NFS is better, and surprisingly viable for data centres. For home use, SFTP seems to be the way to go. 3. Microsoft didn't invent email. 4. Honestly, I never used SharePoint. And Confluence is something I avoid after having used it. 5. Microsoft didn't invent git, or gitweb. They bought GitHub for obvious reasons, it is very central to the JavaScript ecosystem. But if you really need the SVN workflow for git, there are plenty of alternatives, like GitLab. 6. Something like Chef, Puppet, or Ansible? 7. DRM does not provide any security, it is just a defect. You want Unix permissons, just use Unix permissions. 8. Citrix is a nightmare. You need RDP, there are secure open source solutions. And X11 has network transparency as part of the core protocol. 9. Microsoft didn't invent GPG keyservers, and most mail user agents can do encryption transparently. Outlook being one of the exceptions.
Teams and XBox are the things that are keeping people using their Microsoft accounts. Teams has alternatives, like Jitsi and Matrix, but they are not interoperable with Teams. Microsoft Office is also something people cling to, even though LibreOffice can do the same, better, and without requiring any retraining.
Matrix has the ability to hook in compatibility with Teams but it's paid. If the rest of the world (other than the US) is already switching to something Open Source and better, why not just switch with them?
My local walmart has been disrupted by this for months. Not clear why it takes months to install chargers, except probably the electric company drags its feet.
This makes perfect sense: they have plenty of unused parking because people now get stuff delivered or picked for them, so parking dwell time is nil. However, I find it hard to believe that it will bring EV drivers into the store. But maybe.
This largely depends on price and speed. I drive a 2018 Bolt EV. If I'm lower on charge, I can easily sit there for 45-60 minutes. Reduce the speed of the charger and it can be comparable for others. Now reduce the price of the charger and the speed doesn't matter as much. You may as well shop for your necessities at the same time so you'll get multiple things done at once.
Many (most?) WalMarts already have Electrify America charging spots. They are simply cutting out the third party.
This could potentially be good since WalMart would now be directly responsible for maintenance of the equipment, and if they are unavailable it reflects poorly on them directly. =Smidge=
I'd add in that it's much more likely to have EV chargers at WalMart if they own them outright.
Installing solar during construction of the Data Center would arguably be faster, easier and cheaper. Install batteries (they already have backup batteries for the servers required to do the work) and you no longer need to worry about night time use.
The datacenters I've worked in basically had UPS to keep things running till the generators kicked in. I doubt enough UPS power to last all night every night is common, that would require vastly more batteries.
While it does, the costs for those batteries would not exceed the cost of building a dedicated power station+running of that power station+lawsuits for the fumes, pollution of the local water table, noise pollution that would come from having that dedicated standard power station.
Gas turbines probably use fewer acres of land then the equivalent solar farm would and they work 24/7. Not saying solar+wind+batteries isn't a better idea but it's not hard to see why someone might setup a gas power plant instead. Depends how the laws and their personal feels about climate change come into play.
You're thinking wrong here. Solar doesn't need a dedicated area. Install it on the roof or over parking. Both have benefits and, in the case of installing over parking, it even gives you shade and protection from the elements. Even leaving out climate change, using solar means much less maintenance costs, no charge for the electricity, likely production of more electric than is actually used and the ability to continue going when other locations are in black out. We just need to push this with financial arguments seeing as too many corporations seem to actively want to destroy the planet for higher profit margins.
Gas turbines are a well developed technology, and are quick to build. Companies keep looking toward nuclear, but building that is a far longer process. Gas may just be an intermediate step, and will be replaced with cheaper and more sustainable options in the future.
Installing solar during construction of the Data Center would arguably be faster, easier and cheaper. Install batteries (they already have backup batteries for the servers required to do the work) and you no longer need to worry about night time use.
Science may someday discover what faith has always known.