Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Coors Light - been there, done that (Score 1) 174

Looks like much of the USA in winter. Maybe not everyday, but at least several times a week.

I'm sure there're places in the USA where you have such conditions for months on end just like in Lappland, in Wyoming or Minnesota, say, and Alaska is of course even worse. Looks like USA has lots more sunshine though:

http://imgur.com/vYpbh

Comment Re:Coors Light - been there, done that (Score 1) 174

I wonder if the light is strong enough to be seen through snow, when real winter comes... this is one of the main highways in Northern Finland right now: http://www2.liikennevirasto.fi/alk/kelikamerat/C1452301071554.jpg

More real-time webcams of roads there, they're all similar, with entire road surface covered in snow: http://www2.liikennevirasto.fi/alk/english/kelikamerat/kelikamerat_5.html

Comment Re:Present user test? (Score 1) 179

User only needs to press a key during initial installation, after that it should boot unattended just fine: "If the user gives permission, the signature will be installed and loader.efi will then boot up without any present user tests on all subsequent occasions even after the platform is placed back into secure boot mode." http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/blogs/browse/2012/10/linux-foundation-uefi-secure-boot-system-open-source

So I won't have to go around to every classroom and every pc and click OK when I do my monthly wipe and reimage?

If I understand correctly, even reinstallation does not need user attention as long as loader.efi doesn't change. But that's based only on my reading of the article I quoted, so I could be wrong.

Comment Re:Present user test? (Score 1) 179

Does that mean the user has to actually be present to press a key? That renders secure boot unuseable on remote-admined or unattended servers, the very place you would most want to have a secure boot chain.

User only needs to press a key during initial installation, after that it should boot unattended just fine: "If the user gives permission, the signature will be installed and loader.efi will then boot up without any present user tests on all subsequent occasions even after the platform is placed back into secure boot mode." http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/blogs/browse/2012/10/linux-foundation-uefi-secure-boot-system-open-source

Comment Re:Offsite != cloud (Score 2) 326

Here's what I do (with about 3TB data now):

I've got a dedicated backup server at home that backs up all machines there automatically and rsync's the backup to another machine offsite overnight.

I've got an uncapped but relatively slow connection, uplink speed in practice about 2MB/s, but that's enough: it rarely takes more than three hours to do the rsync. Occasionally (like after returning from a two-week trip to Kenya) I've got so much new data (photos) that it takes more than 24 hours, but that's rare (and causes no problems per se, other than increased window of vulnerability, but one day is acceptable for me). Also, both machines have hotswap disk slots, so I could do the sync at home and carry the disks over should I one day get so much new data that rsyncing it over the network would take too long.

This works very well for me. It does require a reasonable network connection and a suitable place for the offsite backup machine, though.

Comment Re:That democracy doesn't work. (Score 1) 181

You have a point, but:

2. I bet you need more than just a simple 50,000 supporters to change the constitution. You probably need 2/3rd (like in many countries) of all votes.

In Finland the parliament can change the constitution, but it has to be supported in two consecutive parliaments (with an election in between) and by 2/3 majority, or by single parliament with 5/6 majority. A bit too easy for my liking, but certainly harder than getting 50000 supporters.

Comment Re:Although nobody is yet able to register support (Score 3, Informative) 181

"You just get a series of links containing "confirm your identity with your bank", click your bank, it takes you to the page of your bank where you enter your banking credentials and confirm that you want to be recognised by that site. Whole process takes about 30 seconds."

Sounds like a wet dream of the phishing industry.

Not really, since the credentials aren't reusable: you have a list of key-value pairs, each used only once, in random order. Moreover, payments require separate confirmation (second key-value match), so even man-in-the-middle attack with identification-only site wouldn't allow stealing your money (well, not that easily anyway).

Comment Re:Wow, does that PR stunt even work anymore? (Score 1) 350

I don't know the legality or widespreadness of this, but at least Norway has started to apply Norwegian law to anyone with a Norwegian citizenship, no matter where the person may find itself. So if you break Norwegian law in, say Thailand, where the action is NOT forbidden, you will still be prosecuted as if the action took place on Norwegian ground. This practice was made to fight child abuse (O REALLY?!) but nothing stops them from taking that further

Interesting. In comparison, Finnish law applies to crimes outside Finnish territory when either the act is also crime in the country where it was committed and carries sufficiently heavy penalty or it is one of explicitly listed crimes (which include child sexual abuse). In most cases it also applies to crimes committed abroad only when either the perpetrator or the victim is a Finnish citizen, but there're a number of exceptions to that (e.g., certain crimes like genocide or when extradition is denied on grounds of possible death penalty or torture).

So you would not be prosecuted in Finland for smoking hashish in the Netherlands even if you are a Finnish citizen, but you could be for raping a child regardless of where it occurred.

Comment Re:"falling over 100% of their previous ranking" (Score 2) 427

Nope. Finnish citizens in Finland are not required to possess any kind of identity card, and I know for a fact that many indeed do not have one at all. The text you quoted does not say a country must require or issue IDs to all its citizens, only that such a card is sufficient to travel abroad (with limitations), and while Finland does have national identity cards in the sense used in that directive, they're not issued to everybody automatically, you must explicitly request one, and it's not free (EUR 53 last I checked). Indeed most people don't have one but rather use a passport or driver's license as ID when needed - but as noted, some people don't have those either. If you don't travel abroad or drive or need to open a new bank account, you can do without.

Comment Re:"falling over 100% of their previous ranking" (Score 5, Informative) 427

perhaps some of us should reflect for a moment about the countries ranked higher than we are, and how they got there, considering where they were (in general, not absolutely speaking in terms of this particular metric) not too long ago... Some of these places were the places I I heard about in school when they talked about repression and how "those commies" were trying to take over the world... Phrases like "Papers, please.... Your papers..." were practically ingrained into our social consciousness, asked of poor innocents in every movie with a scene set in one of these places...

Curiously, Finland remains one of those countries where there's no general legal requirement to carry identification papers or indeed even to have any - and some people actually don't. (There's presidential election going on here right now, and every now and then people come to vote without papers, and there are a number of ways they can, including bringing along someone who can testify they're who they say they are.)

Comment Re:Why we need plausible deniability encryption... (Score 1) 1047

contempt of court will result in you being detained without trial until you comply. If you can not comply you are at the mercy of the judge whose court you are in contempt of. If you never comply and the judge so wishes, you will remain imprisoned until you die.

For comparison, in Finnish law there's a limit how long you can be detained for refusing to testify, namely six months.

Comment Re:If you enjoy your job, then why not? (Score 1) 948

I'm strongly considering investigating a position at a university where I can work on physics or nanotechnology; and, I would easily do it for half what I'm making now, simply for the job satisfaction.

I know and have known many of people who've kept on working despite having no financial need to do so, and also people who've kept on doing the same thing after being fired and having to eat mostly oatmeal porridge to survive on their savings. Mostly they're research scientists. That is indeed something that, at its best, can give you satisfaction over and above everything else. If you've got what it takes, go for it. There're also a number of artists who will keep on doing their thing regardless of money until they starve, but they generally never had a regular job to begin with. (Yeah, they're a minority. But they do exist.)

Comment Re:Schools do - Bus Stop Safety (Score 1) 344

Well, up here in Canada it means that it's pitch black by 5 PM when I get off work. So, yes the kiddies get sun while waiting for the bus in the morning, but on the west side of my timezone, the sun doesn't rise until 8 AM anyway, so in many cases DST isn't enough.

I guess you live in Southern part of Canada, then. :-) Where I live, about 63 degrees North (in Finland, not Canada) we have about 4 hours daylight in winter and 20 hours in summer, and in spring and autumn around the time clocks are changed day length changes so rapidly that it doesn't really matter whether you move clocks or not. The only positive side in DST is that it forces people to check their clocks twice a year.

Comment rsync (Score 1) 320

Taking one way snapshots over a network link to a remote location, for instance using rsync and a remote filesystem that supports snapshots, can be a viable solution for short term backups, but if you want longer term retention, "old hat" backup equipment still is a viable solution. How are you planning to restore from data corruption that happened 2 weeks ago?

It's easy enough to keep any desired schedule of incremental backups with rsync - search for rsnapshot for example, or BackupPC if you want a fancy web-based interface.

Otherwise, 100% agreement: backups should be physically separated from the primary data, preferably by significant geographical distance (think about fire) and duplicated on several locations.

Slashdot Top Deals

Overflow on /dev/null, please empty the bit bucket.

Working...