Comment NY TIMES IS FULL OF SH*T! (Score 0, Flamebait) 746
If you read the article carefully, it shows that NY Times has one or two leaks that the DOJ is "looking into" writing a "proposal" that would confront issues of cyber security.
From there on in it's all spin that Ashcroft is Big Brother. We've heard it all before.
The New York Times and the Washington Post have it in for the Bush administration. They never reveal their "whitehouse sources" and never disclose the "reports" and "proposals" these sources suposedly leak to them. Most of the time it seems like they bought an intern a beer and read his notebook of big ideas.
Most news readers are such sheep! If you went back and analyzed how many of these flash-in-pan big brother stories were "leaked" to the NY Times, and how many of them actually came to be, you'd notice the NY Times is FULL OF SH*T!
Anyone who believes this article is a stupid hippie more intent on thrills than facts.
From there on in it's all spin that Ashcroft is Big Brother. We've heard it all before.
The New York Times and the Washington Post have it in for the Bush administration. They never reveal their "whitehouse sources" and never disclose the "reports" and "proposals" these sources suposedly leak to them. Most of the time it seems like they bought an intern a beer and read his notebook of big ideas.
Most news readers are such sheep! If you went back and analyzed how many of these flash-in-pan big brother stories were "leaked" to the NY Times, and how many of them actually came to be, you'd notice the NY Times is FULL OF SH*T!
Anyone who believes this article is a stupid hippie more intent on thrills than facts.
