Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Isn't the Library already a way to get books fr (Score 2, Insightful) 494

Lost sales? If I borrow the book from the library, chances are I wouldn't have bought it in the first place.

You might also not have ever encountered the book you borrowed! libraries are great discovery mechanisms... that's why we still have STACKS and don't all just sit at the CPU pinpointing exactly what we want.

Comment Re:Isn't the Library already a way to get books fr (Score 1) 494

Of course! The point is, to the end reader they are free! (right, i know, taxes or some other funding provides the resources for the library)...

The author and publishers that are fearful of people pirating their books are irrationally afraid of ebooks and not afraid enough of libraries, based on their viewpoints.

Another point - It's just not sexy or good PR to tell the libraries to take the books out of circulation. ;) It is good buzz to yell at Amazon.

Essentially Google Books is attempting to be what I suggest. I think Google Books will eventually succeed and authors / publishers will get a cut of revenue from advertising and/or subscriptions.

The folks that are trying to kill of digital distribution or cripple it will never win with books. Never in the history of mankind has trying to limit distribution succeeded. The only way to make money in content is to give people BETTER ways to get at content - higher fidelity experiences (movie theaters) OR easier and easier access (itunes, pandora, magnatunes).

One last point that I didn't want to get mixed up in... people generally pay for GREAT content. It's the produces of SWILL that complain the most about piracy. The only way bad content can make money long term is by bait and switch, forced distribution... The business of bad content isn't content, it's arbitrage. Piracy really hurts arbitrage and that's what people are complaining about. Again, go back to my examples of LOTR, Bible, add to those Charles Dickens, Plato, etc. etc. these books are STILL routinely top sellers even though you can EASILY get ecopies, print copies and what not for free.

Comment Isn't the Library already a way to get books free? (Score 2, Insightful) 494

Gosh... books have been free to read for a very long time. It's called a library. So if authors and publishers are worried about piracy of books why don't they cut libraries off? Gimme a break. There are many ways to use the digital mediums ease of distribution to make money/protect artistic ownership. Publishers should consider giving away a very basic digital version of a book, could even make it time sensitive. It would be very cool and very useful to have a world wide public library. Perhaps that seems unreasonable to police... but the reality is people can get whatever written material they want without buying it from a Borders store... and that isn't because of "ebooks". been this way for a very long time. The great books will be purchased by enough people to make money (my gosh, how many copies of LOTR, the Bible, etc. does everyone own... and those books are very easy to get for free!)

Comment Re:Speed of JS engine matters why? (Score 1) 270

C'mon, that's not why we haven't written the next generation web apps. a) there's been no business model for browser based apps up until now (heck, even now there really isn't one other than a big company can buy you...) b) broadband usage is finally a large enough set of users to justify building these apps c) the entire toolchain wasn't in place (dev tools, REST, native XML output, js libraries) I still don't think the js engine speed itself contributed much at all to the glacial development of next gen web apps. and I agree with others that if we could get away from Flex, Silverlight and all these other non standard, none open, need an expensive dev kit to product methods, we'd all be better off.

Slashdot Top Deals

Is your job running? You'd better go catch it!

Working...