Comment Re:About atheism (Score 1) 847
The evolution process in *theory* is proven to work. EPIT, for short.
That said, if the organisms on this earth changes in a way confirming to predictions derived from EPIT, then it's perfectly sound to use it further, where its use can offload work. And that's exactly what's going on among biologists, and now you come into the picture, you're arguing that they may not use EPIT since organisms on this earth has not been proven to be its subjects. Well, duh! Of course it has not, nothing can be proven based on practical observations, for such thing to be possible, one would need to know the state of absolutly everything in this universe (and for your delight, that's not even enough).
So what do we got?
We got EPIT which saves a bundle of work.
And we got you arguing that EPIT is not applied on this earth, instead you say that GOD is applied.
That's fine by me, for all I care he might be, however what strikes me as dumb, though, is that you do not argue about the factual changes of the organisms. Since if you do not, then you're silently accepting that GODs roll in the organism changes, can be integrated into EPIT as if it would not matter (at least not to the ones actually using it).
ps. It can make a different for the ones using EPIT, if GOD is responsible for what's regarded as random factors, and if these faked random factors can be synced with true random factors found in EPIT, it would save loads of work.
-Jimmy
That said, if the organisms on this earth changes in a way confirming to predictions derived from EPIT, then it's perfectly sound to use it further, where its use can offload work. And that's exactly what's going on among biologists, and now you come into the picture, you're arguing that they may not use EPIT since organisms on this earth has not been proven to be its subjects. Well, duh! Of course it has not, nothing can be proven based on practical observations, for such thing to be possible, one would need to know the state of absolutly everything in this universe (and for your delight, that's not even enough).
So what do we got?
We got EPIT which saves a bundle of work.
And we got you arguing that EPIT is not applied on this earth, instead you say that GOD is applied.
That's fine by me, for all I care he might be, however what strikes me as dumb, though, is that you do not argue about the factual changes of the organisms. Since if you do not, then you're silently accepting that GODs roll in the organism changes, can be integrated into EPIT as if it would not matter (at least not to the ones actually using it).
ps. It can make a different for the ones using EPIT, if GOD is responsible for what's regarded as random factors, and if these faked random factors can be synced with true random factors found in EPIT, it would save loads of work.
-Jimmy
