Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment This is not about Breivik (Score 1) 491

This is not about him, this is about us. I don't care what it does to him or what happens to him. The issue is what this does to us when we treat him in an inhumane fashion. We loose part of our humanity. Torture corrupts the mind of the perpetrator much more than the victim. That is why we don't do it.

Comment Another angle (Score 1) 619

East germany is capitalist. It WAS communist but no more is. If you were raised in a capitalist country, let's imagine your country suddently become communist. All your youth you have been fed capitalist propaganda (oh yes, you have) and now you have to live under communism. Will you just say: well ok, the rules have changed and I will play by the new rules? I bet most of you will just fight the system, cheat it and feel proud about it. People raised in communist states have been fed communist propaganda, which does not work under capitalist rule. The problem is not capitalism or communism it's system change.

Comment Re:Advantage over other source hosting services? (Score 1) 120

I just looked it up on the web. It's a no-go because:
  1. Only the trial version is free. With more than 5 users, it cost money.
  2. The code is private, there do not seem to be a way to share it

It's not the same service. I would maybe consider it for proprietary software but it does not replace or Github.

Comment Re:Simple... (Score 3, Informative) 120

Not sure they can. I don't think Github get to decide what license to apply to the code they host. The code belongs to the author until he grants Github a license. If the user doesn't do it explicitly, I'm afraid Github is distributing the code illegally. I don't think Github is allowed to add a public domain license file by default.

Comment Advantage over other source hosting services? (Score 2) 120

I'm using and am happy with it, although there are some minor things I don't like about it: heavy use of JavaScript, the web layout is weak (size set in pixels, no attention made to accessibility, etc...) but overall I didn't find anything better short of hosting myself. I considered Google code, Launchpad, Savannah and Github and found to be the most complete and advanced source hosting service. I found some advantages in using Google code, Launchpad and Savannah. I'm using Launchpad for translations, since it's the only one that does it. Launchpad is nice because it can sync with an external SCM like I found Google code to be less featured but I like the clean layout and overall site performance. Savannah is poorly featured too but does not have advert and is very clean. I found Github to be like, with the same weak points but less featured. I'm curious to know why people would use Github. Is there any advantage over

Comment Re:Puzzled over Gnome 3 hate (Score 1) 169

That's because you don't have a graphic card powerful enough for the shell. It falls back to the usable interface if it can't display the unusable one. I experienced the same. I liked GNOME 3 on a slow computer and tried to install it on the powerful one and that was a disaster. Only the fall back mode is usable. The real shell is not.

Slashdot Top Deals

The most important early product on the way to developing a good product is an imperfect version.