Comment So how rare is this occurance? (Score 0) 83
Comment Aliens are most assuredly avoiding us (Score 0) 534
Comment Re:Geeky fun in D.C. this summer (Score 0) 363
Comment Spoken quest text? (Score -1) 133
Comment Re:Not a long term solution for mobile robotics (Score 0) 83
Compromised Government and Military Sites For Sale 51
Curious NASA Pre-Announcement 286
Comment Whatever you do.. (Score 0) 413
Comment Re:X-Wing marketing conspiracy (Score 0) 104
Comment Re:"The magnetic field lines are clearly visible. (Score 0) 276
Comment Re:Meh (Score 0) 876
Comment Re:My assessment (Score 0) 544
This isn't an apt analogy, I don't see how this is insightful.
We're not making complete inaccurate observations. like your polar bear theory, that would simply assume that every star we see has a solar system with one planet like ours and we assume that each has an earth around it with a population close to ours.
The equasion discussed is trying to eliminate 99.99999 percent of stars out there (excuse my inaccurate percent, its just an example), and state that according to our knowlege of statistics coupled with our understanding of the galaxy, this would be the percentage of habitable planets with intelligent civilations on them; according to our best estimates. At least thats my take away from it. we're using statistics in conjunction with our