I image a paywall in the future. You have it scan the code and the results with an obscured message about possible bugs and issues but need to sign a waver and pay extra money to see the fix. Similar to the scummy reverse phone number and people record finders do today.

Are we talking about AI or humanity?

I heard they tested it on Pete and Trump but couldn't find a heart so they originally were going to scrap the project. At least we won't have to worry about this pesky technology when more funding gets cut for scientific research. Back to the Stone Age for us, just need to build that wall first.

Don't forget broken bathrooms; maybe you covered that with "shitty" outlook?

Curious to understand how this might adversely affect the war effort. AWS has to be in the mix for something related to the US operations.

Just like usps slapping a charge as well. It's the beginning of everything getting a surcharge. No one wants to eat the cost. Unless fuel goes down quick we are going to see this pattern start to take the wheels off the economy. R E C E S S I O N

I can't trust anything published on April 1st and posted about in the following weeks

Agreed but Apple's app store model is so profitable and self sustaining ide is going to make Microsoft cash

why is the plantiff allowed to wait years knowing they have been in violation all along. Money, wait until the coffers are full to sue for maximum potential payout.
Should be like real estate law similar to adverse possession. Not that Snap gets the right but it's grandfathered into allowed if they can prove the other company allowed use by not doing anything about it.

Even though the singer is part of the celebrity grouping, I'll say. I would love to know the details that caused this investigation to get priority one. With all the cutbacks in government headcount etc.. and all the larger issues facing the US domestically. I'm sure this was preferential treatment. I.e. Misuse of resources.

This supercharged the crisis of 2007-2008. not sure there was many articles written about it, but the patterns are the same.
First person tax 8% on the seller bumps their price by 8% to offset it. If there is an intermediary, they tack on 8% and so on and so forth until the costs outweigh the benefits.
Nail people have to make hard decisions as to what they want to purchase and of course cry about their V8 single driver vehicle costing so much to fill up.

The shit is about to come off the rails. Once one person does it a.k.a. USPS it's gonna greenlight everybody else.

It seems much less about him being replaced and more about having his employees digitized.

He doesn't like the layers he has to jump through to track personnel down.

The better question is what happens when they quit or move on?

I'm a big proponent of useful AI. I'm also excited to read the headline where a company sets this agent scenario up and the speed of which calamity ensues causes complete failure (bankruptcy) within a day.

Can we top this click bait article title this week?

I get a ton of founders that try and fail. They give it they're all but come up short.
It's really the venture capitalists that people should be going after and the terms they set forth to make people rich, regardless of their successor failure. Drive clearly isn't about money anymore since the dude still worth about 3 billion. Or maybe he wants to make that double digit billions. I'd say we need more protection for investors, but they should have a sensible idea of risk.