Unlike classrooms, where the learning sessions are interactive, video is mostly passive. There is no feedback, so what makes it better than textbooks?

It was a big deal. You probably missed the party.

Perchance, you are Mr. Wonka?

Less funny than dropping a clunky OS for another clunky one. Which one expends more effort?

Well, at least they're uninstallable. As for mine, they don't even give the choice, except to update.

Not if you don't need the market share.

Even better, Apple could've posted a large disclaimer on the iTunes' download page: "We don't guarantee 100% Windows support"

Poor people tend to breed more because:

1. They have less access to education, and as a result, no idea about family planning.
2. They don't have access to high-tech machineries, meaning they have to employ more labour, including child labour.

You could sterilise them now, but the slums would still be repopulated in no time if you don't tackle the root causes of poverty.

They've been just IS for some time now. And if I'm not mistaken, the last S in ISIS stands for Sham, which is Arabic for Levant. And they claim that the Caliphate has been established.

In electronical systems equipments, something akin to a stroke would be a system failure. A drone stroke is the one you see when drone suddenly coming down crashing to the ocean, with the owner claiming that it was all intentional

My ass was ignorant too, but so was I with regards to Java updater, as I thought it was only the installer that had the checkbox thing. To my dismay, they resorted to bundling it even with security updates!

Regarding point 1, in a same manner, a jew could claim that the jews are the master race of this world, contrary to what the majority of the jews would think. Would you say there's no distinction between them? What Erdogan said borders as being radical. And most radicals don't consider moderates to be part of Islam.

But what has been sent still cannot be retracted.

I thought the system detects and reverts any kind of targeted modding spree?

Is it legal to take video of others with first asking for permission? In case it's not, will the video be admissible as evidence in court?

That's “non-open open source”, with two opens.

In other words, it's the Cathedral model.