Obviously jumping to conclusions, but the irony would be overwhelming.

I have 8 designers; all wanting our website to be more semantic, that disagree with you.

Windows developers are already intimately familiar with the Visual Studio. My guess is the adoption rate would be fairly low if it not only required learning the new framework, but replaced everything familiar about developing on windows by requiring a new IDE.

Spurious, semantic definitions for ontological terms isn't something the web supports... Yet.

It's hard to feign innocence and blame a chinese hacker if people are "talking."

Outside of scanning and known definitions - the only difference between software and malware is intent. Creating a complete, current and accurate list of potential and existing "malware" is like trying to find a list of door and window manufacturers burglars use.

Obviously that's because the plural form of 'hacker' is 'botnet'... Right?

"You'll get it when you get it" model.

And if China responds to our (at least for America) new iron curtain style of business by leveraging their hold on us (http://ustreas.gov/tic/mfh.txt/); potentially kicking the legs out from under an already fragile economic recovery... What is more empty than a husk?

Subject says it all.

ILDasm.exe and get the IL for your viewing pleasure. Utilize shared extensions and enhance any type you feel needs "opt-inable" improving. The only thing you're pseudo-kept out of is the VES, but nothing's telling/restricting you from creating your own runtime hosts. It's what I'd consider client-cloned open source. Do what you want, extend as you need but ultimately the direction and decision for global enhancements is left with a heavily vested company instead of a users community.

I too have played this mission, and while I agree with your statement - saying "dozens" is a little bit of a misnomer. There were many more than a few dozen. Not having read forums or seen clips before playing; I had expected maybe a hostage situation with you partaking in the executions... But this is more on par with "State of Emergeny"'s level of casualties. Granted no where near as graphic, but the volume is there. I'm not complaining or saying I was offended in anyway. Nor am I taking a stance with Russia in banning this. I'm just saying you can't battle misinformation with misinformation.

Although your point is spot on, please stick to car analogies. (O.o)b Comparing them is like determining 'fuel efficiency' based on 'capacity.'