Agreed. They should have linked to the actual follow-up article: http://synesthesiam.com/posts/what-makes-code-hard-to-understand.html

Saccades are on the order of 10s of milliseconds: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccade#Timing_and_kinematics

We tested a total of 29 people in the eye-tracker. Here are some more videos: https://www.youtube.com/user/synesthesiam/videos?sort=dd&view=0&tag_id=&shelf_index=0

There is a follow-up blog post here with more data: http://synesthesiam.com/posts/what-makes-code-hard-to-understand.html and there are many more videos available here: https://www.youtube.com/user/synesthesiam/videos?sort=dd&view=0&tag_id=&shelf_index=0

Thank you for the links! I didn't mean to block your comment on my website. Is it unblocked now?

I mirrored just this post on my University's servers: http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~mihansen/modeling-programmers.html
My network admins were obviously not prepared for Slashdot.

I didn't expect to get Slashdotted, and now my website is down!
Here's my friend's blog post that started this all off: http://blog.theincredibleholk.org/blog/2012/12/18/how-do-we-read-code/
Maybe his website will stay up :)