Comment Re:Impressive resolution (Score 2, Insightful) 146
I'm not "leaking" anything sensitive, so no worries about my job. :-)
However, all the heckling was bothering the hell out of me so I had to go back and double-check my sources, and I apologize; I believe I stand mistaken...the first 2-inch res imagery to which I referred was indeed aerial photography (frown), and a secondary image to which I referred as being awestruck by was a 10cm res image (according to a colleague)...my sincere apologies to BWJones. I am humbled.
Oh, and thanks, Wavicle, for providing the heckle that made me run and check again. (yet another frown)
However, all the heckling was bothering the hell out of me so I had to go back and double-check my sources, and I apologize; I believe I stand mistaken...the first 2-inch res imagery to which I referred was indeed aerial photography (frown), and a secondary image to which I referred as being awestruck by was a 10cm res image (according to a colleague)...my sincere apologies to BWJones. I am humbled.
Oh, and thanks, Wavicle, for providing the heckle that made me run and check again. (yet another frown)
