
I discovered I have a journal on Slashdot!
I think you're making up the issue of one side telling the other side to shut up with respect to scientific debate.
The points you raise about the gulf stream or other models are valid points of debate but they don't refute the sign of the vector they're haggling over the scalar and veracity of models. As an example Copernicus' model was shown to be wrong by Newtons model which in turn was shown to be wrong. The fact that they were fundamentally wrong didn't change that fact that their predictive abilities were *mostly* right. The error was in parts per 100, 1000 or million.
Many of the other points are pseudo math/science or ad hominem and serve no purpose, still saying "You're wrong" is not the same as saying "shut up".
So because Newton's model was mostly right, this model is also partly right? The error marge is a lot bigger in this case. Also, the ad hominem pseudo blabla works both ways..people being accused of being on the oil industry's payroll etcetera.
You will be successful in your work.