It works well until such time that the side you don't agree with ends up in power and decides what is or isn't "political" speech has changed. How well do you think such a system would have worked here in America after Obama got elected (or how about while Bush was President)? Without a concrete and absolute freedom, the rules can be changed at will to mean whatever you need them to mean to protect your side.

The VC should be considered about as unbiased as it gets when it comes to First Amendment issues. The number of times it has ever sided with an effort to restrict speech could likely be counted on one hand.

See also: Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.'s support of the idea of a President doing an end run around Congress. http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/12/jackson-obama-should-declare-a-national-emergency-add-jobs-with-extra-constitutional-action/#ixzz1ahHUc4r6

So you're Mormon then? Fascinating...

I love the "teh Mormons hate teh gheys" meme right there. Yes they gave money to the pro-Prop 8 side, but the last time I checked, the was legal... Unless you want people demonizing your chosen political/moral/philosophical beliefs? Because we can totally do that if you want.

Please. Yes, Mormons don't drink, but they don't stop other people from drinking. Or was I not actually in a bar drinking a local micro-brew the last time I was in Provo, UT? You make an unprovable claim, and chalk it all up to the Mormon Illuminati...