Comment Re:Some Helpful Advise (Score 1) 528
You don't know how secure any OS is until you have written kernel level modules for that OS. I have for both Windows and Linux and Windows security is a joke.
Doctor Slams Hospital's "Please" Policy 572
Comment Re:CSIRO are still good guys (Score 1) 308
US Air Force To Suffer From PS3 Update 349
Games Workshop Sues Warhammer Online Fansite 182
Lower Merion School's Report Says IT Dept. Did It, But Didn't Inhale 232
MIT Unveils First Solar Cells Printed On Paper 125
Japanese Company Turns Diapers Into Energy Source 65
Ubisoft's Authentication Servers Go Down 634
Comment Re:Tax Credit? (Score 1) 577
Did you even read the links you posted? The lupper was patched years ago. Same for XMLRPC. See this link here: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14088/solution.
One of your great links is just a forum of people who say Linux is vulnerable. No documentation of any virus.
Also, these threats hardly count as virii. They are injection attacks on the web server. Most desktop users are not even running a web server. They don't infect OS files, just PHP scripts. If we count PHP injection as virii, then Windows has thousands more vulnerabilities to include.
Lots of the virii noted for Linux are proof of concept code that have never been seen in the wild and only the anti-virus companies seem to have any knowledge of it at all. Maybe because it is in their best interest to find Linux virii. And to spread these virii requires an unsecured system and a priveleged user to run the infected program.
There are plenty of Windows virii that do not require a privileged user to run the virus code. Any user can just connect to a website with code that can infect Windows.
You may be too young to remember, but there are virii for MS that you just have to stick an infected floppy in your drive and it will infect the system all by itself. No program needs to be executed by the user at all.
Comment Re:Tax Credit? (Score 1) 577
Comment Re:I'm paying for WHAT? (Score 1) 577
Comment Re:Tax Credit? (Score 1) 577
Comment Re:A Christian's take (Score 1) 1252
The other (Christian Creation) is believed by a bunch of people that have no evidence verified by any experimentation and in fact has plenty of scientific evidence to the contrary.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article1072638.ece.
So how about in Science class we study the information gathered by the scientific method and leave faith to the people who choose to believe things not in evidence?