Submission + - New version of the MaControl trojan spotted in the wild (sans.edu)
MaControl has been mentioned before on Slashdot"
Comment Why not Fix the Real Problem? (Score 1) 441
Then, after a bit, it hit me how these features really are only necessary due to an antiquated, OS model that would be better served with a complete and total overhaul. OS X might not be for everyone, but the reliance on
Comment Re:SOP (Score 3, Interesting) 129
I'd like to think RIM have a chance now that they're finally making some noteworthy changes to the hardware, but it's also entirely possible they're simply too late to the latest-generation smartphone party. If they managed to switch to the QNX platform on their phone devices I bet the investors would be much happier.
I really wonder, though, if they won't just cease making phones and tablets altogether and roll full Android support into BES for corporate environments. Better do it before Google makes a corporate management platform, though!
Comment Troubling Signs, at the Very Least (Score 4, Insightful) 305
The news that RIM suddenly just renamed BlackBerry OS 6.1 as OS 7 strikes me as an additional sign of desperate moves, too; the OS isn't a major change, as it's not the desired/anticipated move to QNX base or anything.
I used BB's for years, and appreciated them for their excellent email support at the time. The truth is, though, once I had a taste of the Android platform, my days with RIM were over. The nearly-perfect Google data sync and number of applications are big advantages but, for my wife and I, it really came down to the fact that the browser didn't lock up the whole damned phone when a website became unresponsive.
Perhaps they can pull themselves together here--it's not an impossibility--and they're still in much better shape than Microsoft in regards to the smartphone market.
Comment Re:Also there is simply a weight consideration (Score 1) 782
Submission + - Cellphone Carriers Try to Control Signal Boosters (nytimes.com)
"The devices, which cost from $250 to $1,000, depending on how much they increase a signal, work by first capturing cell signals through an external antenna, ideally affixed to the roof of a dwelling. A coaxial cable then transmits the signal inside the house to an amplifier and internal antenna, which strengthen and retransmit it to cellphones. Before, Mr. Kirkland said, he might have had one or two bars indicating signal strength.
“I can walk around my whole home now with full strength reception,” Sean Kirkland said. “I couldn’t be happier.”
But will Mr. Kirkland’s solution remain legal? In March, CTIA-The Wireless Association, which represents cellular service providers, filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission demanding stricter regulation of signal boosters. The commission is considering whether to let Mr. Kirkland and an estimated one million other homeowners continue to use them.
Submission + - Wireless PCIe to enable remote graphics cards (techreport.com) 1
Submission + - Pink Floyd manager: don't stop file-sharing (pcpro.co.uk) 1
Submission + - Inside the Fake PC Recycling Market (osnews.com) 1
Adobe (Temporarily?) Kills 64-Bit Flash For Linux 272
Why No Billion-Dollar Open Source Companies? 487
Submission + - HTML5 vs. Flash: The Case for Flash (infoworld.com) 4