Real ones aren't either, incase you might be too busy watching Jersey Shore to notice the slow lingering decline of the US dollar? Where I would be without your great wisdom I can only wonder....

Careful with that opinion, it could get you fired. ""Although the number of publicly dissenting scientists is growing, many young scientists furtively say that while they also have serious doubts about the global-warming message, they are afraid to speak up for fear of not being promoted—or worse. They have good reason to worry. In 2003, Dr. Chris de Freitas, the editor of the journal Climate Research, dared to publish a peer-reviewed article with the politically incorrect (but factually correct) conclusion that the recent warming is not unusual in the context of climate changes over the past thousand years. The international warming establishment quickly mounted a determined campaign to have Dr. de Freitas removed from his editorial job and fired from his university position. Fortunately, Dr. de Freitas was able to keep his university job."". Quote sourced from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

Regardless of who has what bias or who is a left or right winger, CO2 is not a pollutant. The earth has gone through countless climate changes in its life time and CO2 had nothing to do with it. The opinion piece doesn't say the problem doesn't exist, it merely suggests CO2 isn't what is causing it. Of course THIS line of thinking won't generate billions in tax revenue by way of a carbon taxes.

Your argument (I use that term loosely) is beside the point. Hiring outside companies in order to skirt US immigration laws like that does have a strange side effect of pissing off other people and companies (mainly the ones abiding by the laws obviously). If Microsoft wants to enjoy the benefits of being able to operate in the US market, it should have to abide by the laws JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE. Can you give a single reason why microsoft