Comment Re:"An inode number just isn't a unique descriptor (Score 1) 121
Ok, so the article itself left out that word (on purpose? clickbait? bad journalism?).
But slashdot editors should notice that and call it out with an editorial fix/comment.
Ok, so the article itself left out that word (on purpose? clickbait? bad journalism?).
But slashdot editors should notice that and call it out with an editorial fix/comment.
In a thread titled, "eventfs: Have the inodes all for files and directories all be the same,"
FTFY
Slashdot, stop trying to confuse us by leaving out words.
the format itself allows for much larger documents, she found
Yes and no.
What she found was one reader that in one spot will interpret and display values that exceed the maximum mentioned in the spec for MediaBox. (But it's not like it's actually using those values elsewhere; e.g., File -> Print just shows Page 1 of 1.)
What she didn't find was any reader that supports a UserUnit larger than the 75,000 maximum allowed by Acrobat 7.0.
However, it is true that UserUnit has no limit per the spec "The range of supported values shall be implementation-dependent.".
The "myth of a 381 km x 381 km maximum PDF size" is debunked by that line in the spec, not by the fact that she found a reader that in one spot exceeds the max specified in a different part of the spec.
better than 360KB 5.25" floppies later goind double-density at 720KB and dual-sided for 1.44M (DSDD drives!!)
Clarification:
The 5.25-inch floppy was 360K and 1.2MB.
The 3.25-inch floppy was 720K and 1.44MB.
CMake is easy too.
An old open-source tool called hypermail may be what you're looking for. It parses mbox files and produces HTML pages with the emails sorted by thread, author, subject, date, etc. http://hypermail-project.org/
The expert colleague actually got the *wrong* answer for xy_common. To me, that is the most interesting part of this experiment! What does that tell us? Maybe the "experts" could learn a thing or two from the novices, e.g., slow down a bit and verify results
If you just need debugging, try cgdb. It's very lightweight.
The OST file format is pretty much identical to PST.
(the kind of inconvenience they will hack around, possibly making you even more vulnerable)
Exactly. I worked around it and if I hadn't been able to I probably would have quit. The vpn client for windows enforced the company policy, but the vpn client for linux let me set up split tunelling the way I wanted. So I set up a linux router/firewall and never looked back.
I blogged about it last year: http://hellewell.homeip.net/phillip/blogs/index.php?entry=entry080509-170319
Ok, my curioisty got the best of me. I altered the program to do 100 tests with a random stopping point each time. My results are:
Begins with 1: 20.57%
Begins with 2: 17.69%
Begins with 3: 15.35%
Begins with 4: 13.26%
Begins with 5: 10.86%
Begins with 6: 8.0%
Begins with 7: 6.14%
Begins with 8: 5.1%
Begins with 9: 3.7%
I'm still not seeing the 30% mentioned in the article, but it is a lot closer. Perhaps if I modified it to test a random # of primes instead of test up to a random # that would make a difference, but it doesn't seem like it would.
"Call immediately. Time is running out. We both need to do something monstrous before we die." -- Message from Ralph Steadman to Hunter Thompson