Bingo!

Bingo! Trickle-down econ BS; and MBA outsourcing real work (factories etc.) to China etc. and outsourcing coding/programming to incompetent "monkeys” in India etc.; and deregulation of the insurance industry (bit me personally: no more reporting to Fed --> no more reporting systems).

IF you're helping to clarify THEN thanks.
ELSE
That's what I said. I started by pointing out that the article was wrong in claiming that Double-keyed Browser Caching "forces websites to maintain separate copies of shared resources". Websites only need one file that they can point to (public URL or private filesystem) . . . even if the browser (client) downloads more than once from the website (server).

I know that (tied to parent site / domain name). That means copies in the client browser cache. But, the websites only need one file that they can point to . . .

The storage argument "forces websites to maintain separate copies of shared resources" per domain is a red herring (BS). The websites already have separate directory trees (in CDN). Any shared resources can continue to be shared: just use symbolic links in website tree(s) to the shared resource(s) in CDN. Don't they do this already?

I cannot get a page? (Using eMatrix/uMatrix in Pale Moon) eMatrix/uMatrix: error message unknown domain?
"Failed to load website properly since html-load.com is blocked. Please allow html-load.com"
"This page could not be loaded properly due to incorrect / bad filtering rule(s) of adblockers in use. Please disable all adblockers to continue using the website, (click OK if you'd like to learn more)"
Loading Support

No. The suggestion is to just apply MS updates (or verify in-house) and NOT waste money on some 3rd party middleman company that fails.

This incident is precisely one of the scenarios where blockchain fails: just don't add the explosives to the ledger then final assembly then ship. This does NOT "require multiple actors working together to commit the fraud."

Thanks!

So, we mostly agree on the facts. But, the "tech[nician] in Lebanon" was not mentioned. The article said that at least two Hezbollah members suspected something was amiss with the devices. One of them could have been a/the technician. I’m just curious whether someone spilled the beans (first) or Hezbollah actually found out upon inspection (first).

Respectfully, evidence / news / link?

What is a "Shief"? Is copy & paste really that difficult? "Space Command chief says dialogue with China is too often a one-way street"

NOT lies. The price gouging is from the producers especially snack companies: shrinkflation etc.
Grocery stores do have tiny margins (on brands; I don't know about house-brands).

Sorry. Bad analysis. The gaslines had nothing to due with interest rates. Expensive car repairs are expensive, but not because of interest rates. Get real; your family needed the loan. The real issue with interest rates is balance: interest on (our) savings/investments versus interest on loans.

Yes. How about "It takes one to know one"?

You are assuming good faith! Boeing has already proven multiple times that it cannot be trusted. The umbrella can always pressure the subsidiary: in this case, for the worse. (BTW the sergeants got it right: When you ASSUME, you make an ASS of U and ME!)