Comment .NET should really be called .NOT (Score 0, Flamebait) 490
microsoft (is) .NOT worth the money
windows (is) .NOT a business server .NET lets bugs slip right through
Office (is) .NOT an internet application (or very fast for that matter)
Visual Studio (is) .NOT something new
Windows (is) .NOT stable
the Micro$oft XBux, it's .NOT even a threat to Playstation or Gamecube
Microsoft (is) .NOT an innovator
Microsoft (is) .NOT the answer
Microsoft (is) .NOT an equal player in the industry
Microsoft (is) .NOT to be trusted
Windows (is) .NOT finished
Windows (is) .NOT ready to ship
Windows (is) .NOT user-friendly
Windows (is) .NOT an original product (or even their own product)
Windows (is) .NOT going to boot up this time
Windows (is) .NOT secure
product monikers for future M$ products: .SUX, .BILL (founder of M$ and what you pay to M$), .MS, .NT, .DOS (the real truth), .WIN .BLUE, .BUG -> my favorite
let's try some of these out
Microsoft Windows .BUG Server
Microsoft Windows .BUG Home Edition
Microsoft Windows (really is) .DOS
Microsoft Plus! for Windows .BUG (more bugs 4 j00)
Microsoft Windows .BILL 21st Century Edition 2003 .BUG -> OK, I'm done
www.windows.blue (KABOOM!)
windows (is)
Office (is)
Visual Studio (is)
Windows (is)
the Micro$oft XBux, it's
Microsoft (is)
Microsoft (is)
Microsoft (is)
Microsoft (is)
Windows (is)
Windows (is)
Windows (is)
Windows (is)
Windows (is)
Windows (is)
product monikers for future M$ products:
let's try some of these out
Microsoft Windows
Microsoft Windows
Microsoft Windows (really is)
Microsoft Plus! for Windows
Microsoft Windows
www.windows.blue (KABOOM!)