And why are there "no resources" for it. Yet a programmer at Mozilla saw the need for a memory safe language like Rust and developed it over a few years. Then Mozilla took over.

Is that the design of Rust or is it developers porting existing code in the laziest way by just encapsulating "unsafe" code with a keyword and calling it done? I think is the latter.

Do you have examples where Rust is implemented with unsafe? I would think Google implementing Rust code in Android for memory safety would not just allow unsafe everywhere.

And you're making the assumption that somehow the OP's roads are "badly designed" based on nothing. Miss the point, much?

Why would Zeiss be upset again? Unless China simply stole their technology, why would any company be "upset" that another company does any thing? Are you upset your neighbor makes more money than you at the same job?

It is possible that China found a simpler/cheaper way to create the light source for EUV; however, simpler and less expensive does not lead to better production or yields. We will have to see.

Again, I don't believe anything China says just like I don't believe anything Intel says. Intel said their 14th generation was better than their 13th generation. It was not; it just used more power to artificially achieve better performance.

It is not just the semiconductor industry where China's claims are to be met with skepticism. In high-tech industries like combat aircraft, China's J-20 was lauded to be its next generation stealth fighter that rivals the US F-35. However China also claimed its older (and "stealth killer") J-10C shot down one of their J-20s in a war drill. So their 1990s fighter shot down their "next gen stealth fighter". Can you see what is wrong with that statement?

I would not call James Gosling young nor naïve at 39 when he started Java in 1994. Nor Larry Wall who was 46 when he announced what would become Perl 6 in 2000, a language he started at 33. You can have opinions about their strategies and design but calling them "young and naive" is rather ignorant of programming history.

[sarcasm]As opposed to every other language that never had scope creep. All other languages were perfect on inception to current day. [/sarcasm]

Er what? Scala was designed to over come the criticisms of Java. It is a high-level language that translates to bytecode and requires a JVM. How is that "identical" to Rust which is more general purpose but can be used as a low-level language that compiles directly into machine code? That's like saying a gasoline combustion engine has "nearly an identical design" to an electric vehicle engine.

Sure but did you ever figure out why no one has yet done that? There are ways to harden C and C++ like with compiler options, but no one has come out with a version that has safety built in. Bjarne Stroustrup has started efforts to harden C++ but that come only after Rust started making progress. The main reason I can see is the some C/C++ developers do not want to be told what to do or how to write safer code. They know better than anyone else. They will not embrace a safer C/C++ just like they will not embrace Rust.

While you are at it, how after deadly reptiles: Cobra, Python

Amateur. It's more like:
*drops to knees* KHAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNN!

And that is the assumption you made. The article specifically mentions "affiliates, parents, or subsidiaries” accounts. The way I read it, if you owe Apple money, Apple is not asking Epic Game Store for the money. If you have multiple accounts, Apple is not limiting withdrawing from the main account. Banks have done this where overdrafts on checking gets pulled from savings or other accounts. I would assume if the amount owed exceeds money in all accounts, then Apple would use a third party debt collector.

Where in the world did you read that Apple "can arbitrarily make up a number"? The article says that IF a developer owes Apple money, Apple can pull the funds not from the developer's primary account but other accounts the developer might have. For example if a developer has a separate account for two apps and one of them is in the red, Apple can withdraw money from the other account.

If I read the article correctly, Apple will go after debt that a developer owes them by withdrawing from other accounts that developer might have. If the developer has "affiliates, parents, or subsidiaries" accounts, then Apple will get the money from them. How is that a debt collector again which is normally someone recovering debts for a third party?

And no one said any of that. In the world today, the current EUV machines are made by one company in the world. It is ASML in the Netherlands. The US nor Japan produces them, and both countries have a long history with making lithography machines. The problem was the cost of R&D and the specific strategies to make EUV was successful only for one company. Making EUV machines is not an easy task that someone can do in their garage this weekend.

Can China copy everything ASML did? Sure. The issue is that it will take them a while to do so as part of the difficulty with EUV is that only very specific companies make the parts as EUV is on the cutting edge of technology. And as long as China is willing to spend huge amounts of money so that their machines are never profitable, they can do that.