Maybe, maybe not. That might only stop the AI from accessing the account, That does not stop hackers from getting AI to give up your passwords. I do not assume AI security it good enough right now to stop someone from prompting to get past the security.

I mean people have probably sued lawnmower companies because they were not warned to not to lift the mower with their hands when it was running. For every warning sign you see that you think it is stupidly obvious, there was probably someone who did exactly what was warned.

No one is forcing you to upgrade your iPad every 2-3 years just like no one is forcing you to upgrade your iPhone every year. Some people want to upgrade; that is their choice. For some people, they need an additional iPad for their children/spouse etc. For some, their iPad met an unfortunate end. For most of us, we upgrade if and when we need.

The iPad mini costs more than the base iPad because the base iPad is using a 4 year old chip. The base iPad in the current lineup as far as I remember got the oldest chips. The iPad mini is not cheaper than the iPad Air or iPad Pro.

The iPad does not have cellphone chips so using it as an iPhone is simply not possible. This is known. Not sure why you think Apple is trying to screw you over if you cannot use it as a cellphone when it is not a cellphone.

No part of your statements says that DHS obtained a warrant to search and seize his phone. This where DHS is using SchrÃdinger's reasoning: According to DHS, they do not need a warrant because the search was "random" and he was not under any investigation. Yet they told Customs to look for certain things because he was under investigation and he was targeted for a search at the border. It turns out they lied and the search was not random. Such a search requires a warrant. Therefore the search was illegal.

You seem to have ignored the legal problem where if the search is not legal, there can be no crime with destroying the data. Second, I would point out that the data has not been destroyed. It still exists on his phone. It cannot be decrypted at the moment.

Your person and luggage can be searched without a warrant; however, seizure is limited to specific things. Contraband, food, etc. There are conflicting federal court rulings as to whether devices can be searched without a warrant. In this case, DHS was arguing that they did not need a warrant because Turnick was not under investigation yet they knew to search him because he was under investigation.

I am shocked to learn that gambling was happening in this establishment

But how will MS sell—I mean personalize your Windows experience? Here is something I noticed about their widgets: they do not obey Windows privacy settings. If you turn off Location Services, the widgets still locate you.

Every tech reviewer I read or watched says 8GB is fine for the Neo for the average consumer. For more intensive routine work like 4K video editing, you should get a different machine. Some reviewers would like more especially for future proofing but they remind everyone again of the current RAM situation. There is no "glazing" as much as just sensible recommendations.

To me the metric is saying the same thing as "We heard all the complaints with our old turd. As a result, our new turd is shinier."

Again. In Windows, Windows components, Excel, and Outlook have almost all the memory. It does not say cached. It does not say swap. Linux and MacOS designates memory as cached or not.

Dell went private in 2013.

Also it less liability to merely cover them. Flock cannot claim that their tech was "damaged" during the removal by the college if they were not removed.