Either way, the answer is simple. Rather than having a tax system based on how much money a person makes, why not have a tax system based on how much money people spend? Jobs borrowed billions using his stock as collateral. What happened to that money? I'm going to take a guess and say he spent it at some point.
Chances are he just reinvested the majority of it.
Some of the greatest inventions came from people who were labelled as crackpots in their day.
and some of the worst inventions come from crackpots everyday.
Shamefully, I will admit that I assumed they were always fair, so I definitely learned something.
I would also be interested in hearing what you think is missing from the
The client workstations all need
.Net and IIS for the application to work.
Find a new company. Quick.
There is no such requirement in any jurisdiction I've looked at
I'm not sure which jurisdictions you've looked at but you may want to look again. Usually there are five elements of a valid contract:
Consideration is exactly what the gp post was talking about. Of course, never take legal advice on slashdot.
Personally, I trust scientists much more than businessmen. Good scientists are trained to be brutally honest with themselves, and to use methods that expose rather than hide flaws in their own reasoning.
Businessmen are trained to be confident in their abilities and conclusions regardless of reality.
This means that when businessmen look at the objective opinions of good scientists, with their "given this" and "see chart X for exceptions", they blow them off. Then they spend millions pointing out how the scientists can't even make up their mind.
For me, it's an easy choice.
Wow. So in your over-generalized world, scientists are smart and good and businessmen are evil and stupid. I'm shocked that you choose to side with the scientists.
Also, it is the Scrum Masters job to shield the team from pressure from higher management. Stakeholders are allowed to (and must) prioritise tasks, but the influence should end there
In my experience, people at the level of a Scrum Master may have the responsibility to shield the team but they rarely have the authority. If the Scrum Master, or even a level higher, is unable to deliver to management's expectations, don't believe management is meeting to decide how they failed or how to replace themselves.
a majority shareholder would have > 50%+1!
An unacceptable one off error, please test boundary cases before checking in your comments
Do not underestimate the value of print statements for debugging. Don't have aesthetic convulsions when using them, either.
