Oh please, 19th century scientists had worked out the issue with CO2: https://daily.jstor.org/how-19...

I think it's rather deduction by the simple.

They changed the recipe for teflon about a decade ago due to toxicity concerns. Also, consider the way that size does matter: compounds that are non-toxic above a certain size can have completely different effects as nano-particles.

Unless they are the ones that move quickly along the same paths, in which case they are the blood cells moving through the blood vessels IN FRONT of the retina. Best seen against a white background.

I can't find the article right now, but there was a researcher that showed you get double the yield growing rice in non-flooded fields. But weeds, so yeah nah...

China is also importing a lot of water in that food.

I can't find the article right now, but there was a researcher that showed you get double the yield growing rice in non-flooded fields. But weeds, so yeah nah...

hahahahaha

What a moronic username.

You are an awful person.

It is not illegal to imagine a crime.

You cannot copyright your own likeness, however someone else can, see Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill.

So people can pretend to themselves they are being more healthy/caring without having to actually make any real changes at all?

Utter nonsense. This would only be true if we had made cows from scratch, instead of the mere warping of a natural grazing animal. The rest of your post is spot-on though. :-)

Why? Blame is a negative energy-wasting distraction.