Funny. It is neither a cost, nor a loss, simply unearned.
Their budget may say they will probably earn it, but that does not make it true.
That money was never theirs.

I disagree, I categorise edibles thusly:
Food is alive.
Non-alive edibles are either:
Survival Rations (made out of food, can still spoil. E.g. Pasta sauce).
Drugs (made more out of chemicals or food processed to unrecognisability, tends not to spoil. E.g.: Lollies, potato chips).

I consider the last 2 to be a spectrum sliding from Survival Rations to Drugs based primarily on sugar-content.

I think the issue is the difference between these 2 forms of ultra-processing: (a) throwing a bunch of essentially-otherwise-waste together with various flavouring and shelf-life-prolonging chemicals to make an "edible" hotdog. (b) Assembling a highly-researched collection of highly-nutritious ingredients, perhaps to the molecular level, to make a total-food baby formula.
One of these things is not like the other.

Also, I DO have a very simple bucket that IS both VERY clear and VERY helpful: Food is alive!

Oh please, 19th century scientists had worked out the issue with CO2: https://daily.jstor.org/how-19...

I think it's rather deduction by the simple.

They changed the recipe for teflon about a decade ago due to toxicity concerns. Also, consider the way that size does matter: compounds that are non-toxic above a certain size can have completely different effects as nano-particles.

Unless they are the ones that move quickly along the same paths, in which case they are the blood cells moving through the blood vessels IN FRONT of the retina. Best seen against a white background.

I can't find the article right now, but there was a researcher that showed you get double the yield growing rice in non-flooded fields. But weeds, so yeah nah...

China is also importing a lot of water in that food.

I can't find the article right now, but there was a researcher that showed you get double the yield growing rice in non-flooded fields. But weeds, so yeah nah...

hahahahaha

What a moronic username.

You are an awful person.

It is not illegal to imagine a crime.

You cannot copyright your own likeness, however someone else can, see Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill.