Should I plant corn again, or should I make the move and spend a few million dollars on equipment to start farming grain?

If you think farmers are only worried about the weather tomorrow you've never met a farmer.

Two differences. Hitler could also write pictures.

Plants perform cellular respiration the same way you do. That means they emit CO2. They ALSO absorb CO2 during photosynthesis. Photosynthesis notably requires sunlight.

You can learn quite a lot about crop metabolism by measuring changes in day/night CO2.

https://retractionwatch.com/

They did.

a retracted paper is an admission that they lied

Papers are retracted for all kinds of reasons, some of which are fraud and misconduct, but others are admirable.

The free market sorts it out just fine. Nobody likes the value the free market chooses for their life though.

There were carbon fibre deep sea vessels before Titan, including for the US Navy.

You can build an experimental titanium submersible, skip certification tests and have it fail too.

It is truly shocking that something users requested be shared publicly on the internet was shared publicly on the internet.

I think if 1% of F150s were liable to stop suddenly and need a tow then we would be hearing about that too.

About 1% of F150s built this spring have been recalled due to an issue that can cause the steering system to detach while driving.

It's vacillating but lubricated with vaseline.

In Canada it's $20, despite the US constantly pressuring us to raise it (lol).

But neither of us have 200% import taxes.

There are LOTS of people who run companies that import stuff that doesn't meet legal requirements in the importing country. They're not going to stop. They're going to get more customers though, because they don't have to compete with untaxed direct imports.

Live by the sword, die by the sword. The problem with riling up delusional conspiracy theorists is that they're delusional conspiracy theorists.

Admittedly, riling up delusional conspiracy theorists with stuff that you actually did yourself is extra special.

to give us the time to disconnect them

That's the real bad news for the US, and very good news, minus some short term pain, for the rest of the world. Bye bye soft power, exhorbitant privilege, joint operational dependency via dictating what capabilities NATO members can and can't have, etc.

And reversing the policies, tomorrow or in a few years isn't going to make a difference.

You experience the quantum nature of the photoelectric effect whenever you try and dim an LED bulb with an old fashioned dimmer. There are lots of people who rant on the internet about it.

What do you mean by "it takes quantum mechanics to explain lasers and magnets, but we don't experience the quantum nature of them." This statement doesn't really make sense. I suspect what you mean is that we don't normally experience specific contrived situations that are purposely chosen to seem weird. This is true. It's pretty much tautological.

It also applies to lots of other things. You don't normally experience the blind spot in your eyes. That doesn't mean you can't understand it. You routinely experience, but don't notice many of your visual and auditory systems' other hijinks until a situation is accidentally or purposely contrived to highlight them, then the internet spends six months arguing about whether the dress is white or blue, whether an Elmo doll said a bad word, or how amazing some magician's performance is. Yet you can understand those things just fine, with a bit of effort.

All those examples involve confronting, and abandoning, implicit assumptions in the lazy way your brain "understands" things in its everyday experience. Most people's "understanding" of ordinary mechanics is very cartoonish, as in, much like cartoon physics. This is not a rhetorical assertion, studies back it up. To them, Newton's first law is counterintuitive, and certainly not something they think they experience in everyday life.

Quantum physics is the same, with the interesting difference that, at least right now, we don't know which of a fairly small number of assumptions are invalid. So you can pick the subset you like and there you go. The existence of multiple workable subsets is why we have multiple equivalent interpretations, and why we argue about which one is "right."

You contend incorrectly.

Interpretations are just stories. They don't make testable predictions. The math they're based on does, but for the most part they're based on the same math, so they make the same predictions. Where that's not strictly true, for example, path integrals and Feinman diagrams are often associated with many worlds, the math is equivalent, in the formally proven mathematical sense.