Look at this person gaslighting!! This is the obvious question that needs to be asked, and the obvious "doublespeak" by the state to "assume the vaccine works unless proven otherwise." Meanwhile, we are supposed to "assume treatments like ivermectin do not work until proven by our specific scientists" https://ivmmeta.com/ - amazing world we live in when someone asks the obvious question, someone else comes out to gaslight them!

so you agree they are a publisher, not a community forum https://imgflip.com/i/4pqt3n

https://imgflip.com/i/4pqt3n

This is back to publisher versus forum. Obviously, if they choose not to publish certain content because it's against their views, they are a publisher, not a public forum. At the same time, there's a million videos out there with fake news, hate speech, etc, which are against the mainstream manufactured consensus and therefore not censored, so, there is a huge grey area and clearly, the publisher is taking their own side to decide what they do and do not want to publish based on the political views of their handlers. Regardless if you believe in election fraud or not, this is a much bigger issue than that. If you agree with censoring any opinions that are not proven in a court of law, then where were you when they were not censoring stories about prostitutes urinating on beds in front of the president Obviously, they have a political agenda, and it's not freedom of speech. Heck, i just go PERMANENTLY BANNED on imgur for posting a meme showing data from a vaccine study where people were injured. This is the kind of stuff we used to laugh at the USSR at back in the 1980s.

Indeed, when the system is setup in a way where it's impossible to prove integrity or not (beyond your news sources all controlled by a single conglomerate), then proof is much harder. Sworn affidavits of poll workers and endless statistical anomalies be damned.

Right, what happens when we extend the tracking of the carbon footprint to all aspects of life? Do you really think the top 1% is going to be closer to the mean? Unlikely.

I didn't realize posting a fact about election machines being made in China makes me a Trump supporter. That's what happens when you are taught that everything in this world is binary, I guess.

But trust us, the election is totally secure.

So, when will we realize that the solution to our economic, social, and environmental problems is to address the elite, who push policies from which they exempt themselves? Policies that, if they were the ONLY ones following them, would make the biggest difference?

So, treating 350 patients, along with themselves and other doctors as a prophylaxis, with only 1 covid death among the group, with a drug that has been on the market for 60 years with very little side effects and little to no deaths from it, handed out like candy in developing equatorial countries, is so much more of a public health risk than covid or closing the world indefinitely that a video from TRAINED MEDICAL DOCTORS ON THE FRONT LINES OF FIGHTING THE DISEASE must be SCRUBBED from the internet and anyone posting it must be BANNED? How many big pharmaceuticals have this kind of track record? Certainly a vaccine rushed to market with no long term safety studies (60 years) and limited efficacy (As Bill gates mentioned in another SCRUBBED video that the vaccine may not be safe and that's ok because we need it to get to market) would not be any safer than HCQ + ZINC (don't forget the zinc because all of the rigged studies leave it out). Hopefully this comment won't be banned for sharing facts.