Comment OSM for practical navigation (Score 2) 39
I'm all for using open source software and information but it has to be at least 90% as good as the commercial alternatives especially if those commercial alternatives are reasonably priced. I'm going on a trip to Las Vegas, a city with extremely complex infrastructure including multiple monorail systems, a public bus system, complex streets, taxi and bus specific lanes, and a high density of shops and restaurants residing on multiple levels in extremely large buildings. I figured it would be the perfect opportunity for OSM to show off the best it has to offer.
Google appears so overwhelmingly better at handling all of those complex mapping scenarios to the point where OSM can't be seriously considered for people trying to use it to navigate that city. Most business data is out of date, public transit stops aren't as detailed, and it doesn't have the internal structures of buildings that take up multiple city blocks.
Interestingly enough my own city's OSM data is top notch, easily surpassing Google's data. Clearly there seems to be wide range of map data in the database, but I would think large cities that people travel to often seems like the place you really want high quality data and visualization if you want non-ideological users to switch. Had I not looked at my own community I would have written off OSM as a totally underdeveloped open source project with no chance of competing, and it seems like that's the exact opposite of the potential it has, but clearly there needs to be more outreach in some larger cities.
Google appears so overwhelmingly better at handling all of those complex mapping scenarios to the point where OSM can't be seriously considered for people trying to use it to navigate that city. Most business data is out of date, public transit stops aren't as detailed, and it doesn't have the internal structures of buildings that take up multiple city blocks.
Interestingly enough my own city's OSM data is top notch, easily surpassing Google's data. Clearly there seems to be wide range of map data in the database, but I would think large cities that people travel to often seems like the place you really want high quality data and visualization if you want non-ideological users to switch. Had I not looked at my own community I would have written off OSM as a totally underdeveloped open source project with no chance of competing, and it seems like that's the exact opposite of the potential it has, but clearly there needs to be more outreach in some larger cities.