Comment Re:Depends on what university (Score 1) 582
The flipside is that if a story were to appear on Slashdot about a large university whose network went down for several hours or days because of something accidental or malicious done by a student, people would be falling over themselves to gripe about the incompetence of the network admins.
That's because they *would* be incompetent in this case. If a student brought the network down by simply using the connection then something is wrong with the network. My university does not censor anything and there have been no major outages that I know of. They don't block outgoing traffic and on the wireless you even get a public IP address with both incoming and outgoing traffic allowed and yet the network manages to stay up somehow. Of course the network is set up competently, i.e. students' connections are isolated as much as possible, so even if a student's machine is compromised (which happens a lot I imagine) it is no worse for the others than any of the millions of compromised machines on the Internet. Also, there are some (negotiable) caps to prevent bandwidth wasting.
And even if the network is not properly set up, how is censoring open-source communities' websites such as hackaday going to help it anyway?