Re:Perfect (Score 1)

The clause says "to promote the human rights of the END USER" - sounds like its within the realm of technology to me. Basically, I think that the whole clause centers around the movement that Linux has been taking lately - the end user, desktop Linux, that sort of thing. Sadly, it's stopping to be about programming just to program, and becoming programming people - and later - for money. I can't say that this is a problem though - Linux needs to be more competitive to attract the average user that doesn't have enough time, knowhow - or desire to learn about computers in depth. Not everyone's a computer person, the same that not everyone is an art person, or a sports person. Since Linux is an open-source development - it can, and should cater to everyone. As far as the clause goes, I don't see a problem with it. If you wanna try and be secular about it, I don't see anything that steps out of the boundaries of technology - it says the END USER. If you'd rather read into, then sure, there might be a political message, but at least it's a good one. I'm sorry to say, but the world is becoming more and more political: I'd just love to see what kind of comments I get back - those should be proof enough that the world is political. So, if the world's going to be political - we might as well be sending out good political messages instead of bad ones. Check Six!!! Snoopy